It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragnet53
reply to post by PookztA
I don't believe she is a doctor.
edit on 16-9-2010 by dragnet53 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragnet53
I don't believe she is a doctor.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by lambros56
I think Judy Woods theory is plausible but i would like to know why so many people
brush her aside, some call her wacky etc.
Because her theory relies upon fantasy physics and fantasy mechanics. There's no physical basis for it, but that hasn't stopped her hooking up with conmen who claim to have discovered new physics that nobody else can replicate.
People call her wacky, because she is completely away with the fairies.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
I think she's out there to make the movement look like a bunch of nut balls.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
She's looking more and more like a government plant. What better way than to slap a fake engineering degree onto somebody, then give that somebody some fake information about fake space beams bringing down the towers. All in an attempt to distract the 9/11 truth movement from controlled demolitions.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by dragnet53
I don't believe she is a doctor.
She's looking more and more like a government plant. What better way than to slap a fake engineering degree onto somebody, then give that somebody some fake information about fake space beams bringing down the towers. All in an attempt to distract the 9/11 truth movement from controlled demolitions.
She even had the nerve to say that our hero first responders did not see molten steel and that instead they, our first responders, were victims of a psyop!
This woman is a disgrace to the scientific community and has no business being anywhere near the science or engineering fields, let alone a teaching job.
edit on 16-9-2010 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragnet53
Yup, what better way than to sway the masses from the real truth. Sadly, people ...errr sheople are this easily swayed by her. I noticed that since the AE911truth movement started she started and when their movement got stronger it seems she is pushing hard to get people to believe her.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
reply to post by PookztA
Why do you have to keep spamming the disinfo from this fake "Dr."? Your threads keep dying for a reason: nobody is interested or cares about her disinfo. You already have a thread here with the same exact information.
You had a thread removed yesterday because you keep posting the same exact information that you just posted again. That is spamming.
Spamming this fake "Dr."'s disinformation over and over again isn't going to get people to believe her.
Debunks to here disinfo here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
A video of her looking like a fruit loop who can't even remember or quote her own numbers or calculations:
video.google.com...
Watching the above video, is she suffering from a mental disease or did "someone else" concoct her "work" and she is just having problems remembering? You decide.
edit on 13-9-2010 by _BoneZ_ because: because because because because because.......
Originally posted by Red_xi
After watching that video, I agree that she doesn't have a clue. You have to admire Greg Jenkins so much
...the same reason why so many 9/11 "Truth" groups and Wikipedia censor discussion about Dr. Wood, the same reason why there is an organized campaign to discredit Dr. Wood and divert people away from the evidence she has gathered, and the same reason Dr. Wood's graduate student, Michael Zebuhr, was murdered in 2006. See here: www.iamthewitness.com...
Professor Wood is stupid, or a criminal
She woke up from a coma and decided her calling was to become a professor. She did not really seem to know the material, and she was hopeless at trying to convey it to the student. She fails to be able to complete a thought if not a sentence. If it is possible at all, avoid her.
Originally posted by Red_xi
She did not really seem to know the material, and she was hopeless at trying to convey it to the student. She fails to be able to complete a thought if not a sentence.
Originally posted by PookztA
Shouldn't they be eager to figure out exactly what happened, instead of censoring discussions of the evidence?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by PookztA
Shouldn't they be eager to figure out exactly what happened, instead of censoring discussions of the evidence?
Discussions of the "evidence" happened years ago and the 9/11 truth movement has since moved on, so why can't you?
I'm sorry that you're a little late to the party, but Judy Wood and the no-planers lost. Deal with it.