I stopped reading at page 2 really...
Ppl with apparently no analytic expertise throwing out accusations instead of diskussing the actual topic, or bringing up "explanations" clearly
nonsense to anyone who managed to not fall asleep during freshman physics...
Am i the only one whos reminded of egytologists telling one rubbish about ropes and chisels? -.-
(At least i have a new category of stuff i will spent major time on now, namely whatever the trolls of this thread claim to be false.)
I went to a school for applied technics for 3 long years, had countless hours of material science and physics, and im telling you: Hydrocarbons dont
vaporize steel. Period.
(Oh by the way, flying rubble, soaked with Jet Fuel or not, doesent melt motorblocks neither... *cough*)
You think generations of men miserably failed building an oven capable of melting iron because they didnt get the simple Idea of "Make fire bigger!"
It doesent really matter how much stuff (ie. Buero Materials and/or Jet Fuel) you throw on a pile, this kind of reaction simply doesent release a
sufficient ammount of energy without a VAST volume of air beeing blown through it(Wind was what? 7mph that day in NY?).
Modern day blast furnaces need a constant stream of pure oxygene pumped into the reaction chamber, in order to maintain the temperature required to
Leave alone vaporizing it, heck not even Thermite could do that to more than "maybe" a very tiny portion of the overall material, granted its some
sort of high-tech-military stuff(Ordinary Thermite wont even be able to turn that tiny little bit into vapor.).
But then, wheres all the reaction material?
Im not talking about some alibi samples with "traces of aluminiumoxide" or whatever, but a 20-30m PILE of metal/oxide remains(just imagine the labor
required to actually place all this stuff without public notice).
Wich directly leads us to the MAIN point.
WHERE is all the building material?
Where are the 2 100+m piles of rubble that should have been on the site?
Leave alone ALL the other evidence and answer THIS alone to someone with the slightest bit of scientific education!
One cant stress this enough: WHERE is all the stuff gone?
Even if you squeeze every bit of material into the lower levels, we still should have an immense pile of debris(mind that the steel bars wouldnt have
been squeezed into 1 compact cube, but take up alot of space due to their, very sturdy, hollow structure).
As disturbing as both may sound, only Dimirtis underground nuke theory(Wich can be pretty much ruled out, since he addmitted the FBI supporting his
theory. So nope, that wasnt it.) and Ms. Woods DEW Theory are atm explaining this mysterious vanishment of about 1mil TONS of "stuff"!
None of the other theories actually explains somewhat reasonable how this could possibly be the case, and theyr all blindly IGNORING that fact.
Dont just hold onto stuff youve believed for years(google up the temperatures needed for vaporizing iron alloys, this whole jet fuel/thermite stuff
wasnt really working from day1) , for the same reasons mainstream science acts like it does!
That wont get you anywhere near what really happened...
Spontaneous combustion of metal structures like cars, or explosion of gas cannisters is allso a weired fact that HAS to be taken into account...
Theres eyewitness reports from firefighters that are imo reliable, and we musnt ignore their claims!
An underground nukes emp surely wouldnt cause a Faraday cage(wich a car essentially is) to catch fire, would it?
(Again, rubble on fire, flying or not, does NOT melt motorblocks.)
I for my part will stick with: If everything else has been ruled out, whats left must be the truth, as impossible as it may seem.
Ms. Woods made a huge mistake to bring up the term hutchinson effect, other than that i really cant see any flaw in her logic.
I have learned something from this thread: If Wikipedia does fancy censorship, if someones being personally attacked, their believe system rediculed
when his/her beliefes arent anyhow part of the diskussion, when "experts" come up with laughable rubbish to "falsify" something, then THATS where you
should have a VERY close look at.
I suggest you go fire up Ms. Woods website and check for yourself how "crazy" this person appears to you...
why has not one duhbunker done that???
bc its rubbish, and the attempt to mathematically proove it will fail.
There has to be SOME resistance, no matter what scenario you assume, wich totally contradicts freefall velocity.
In order to make this work youd have to propose an unlimited propagation velocity of the shockwave(s), caused whenever a story impacts onto the one
below, to begin with(and violate a couple of physical laws), since you need it to be instantly shattered or youd have a small delay for each floor.
Taken the number of stories into account this is just absurd, nothing short of quantum leaps/entanglement happens instantly...
20-6-2014 by Dolour because: moar typos