It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Ok so maybe someone should point out that it's not a mosque. Also there has been and still is a real mosque closer to ground zero than this is.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Theres no point in pointing this out. No matter what anyone says the people against this will still believe it to be a Mosque, rather than a community centre with two floors for worship. Your second point just seems to enrage these people further.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Go ahead and support the concept of them having the right to build it, but to argue furiously for their push to do so is an agnostic abomination.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
Well saying there's no point in reasoning with the detractors would seem to take a side.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I never said any religion or ethnicity is above any other. I criticize them all for having their monolithic "community" centers that symbolically push out outsiders. Sure they have the right, but to do it even the most disparate location is conceded at best.
I didn't say stop them. I said don't support their push to do it.
[edit on 21-8-2010 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
This is the same thing myelf and many others have been saying. By banning the Mosque you really help th recruiting efforts of extremists and even peaceful Muslims may find it offensive and feel persecuted.
I will never understand why ground zero is considered hallowed ground (even though it's 2 blocks away from ground zero).
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I can explain that for you!
Well actually I am going to let a former President of the United States explain that for you:
Originally posted by Shark VA84
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
proto, I have enjoyed many of your posts on this particular website, and I thank you as well for the kind words. The point in fact is that no matter our stance, no matter our understanding of a certain issue, most everyone around here can come to the conclusion that a peaceful and sustainable future is in the best interest of everyone. The open dialogue and freedom of speech provided on forums and websites such as ATS (still the best imo) allow us all to come out of the wood-work and help each other progress as intelligent, intellectual and informed human beings.
You seem to have a pretty good grasp on the Army and its special operations command, glad to see it honestly. I wish you well into the future, and look forward to our future discussions together. If there are any punctuation errors in this post I apologize, I will correct them in a more sober state in the morning.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I can explain that for you!
Well actually I am going to let a former President of the United States explain that for you:
I'm confused, while i understand that all ground in the USA may be considered important as it is the land your forefathers set in place and protected under a banner of freedom and protection of the state, i don't understand why that specific spot is considered so vitally important by some just because a lot of people died in a terrorist attack.
Actually by keeping the spot as special the terrorists sort of win because by remembering it and keeping it in the minds of younger generations it just serves as a monument to hatred, either the terrorists hating the USA or some US citizens hating the Muslims.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
reply to post by name pending
But at the same time this stuff is symbolic. Agree they should have a right to do it, sure. But to take a side and say they SHOULD build there is giving a big middle finger to those who suffered, who lost family, or are dying right now from the response. Plain and simple.
And do you really think a Muslim Community Center will be open to any and all? Is any ethnically oriented community center inherently open to all?
The project's organizers have said that the center, called Park51, is modeled on Manhattan's 92nd Street Y, a community center open to all New Yorkers. Park51 is also intended to be open to the entire community, though there will be some restrictions based on Muslim traditions.
It would house meeting rooms, a fitness center, a swimming pool, a basketball court, a restaurant and culinary school, a library, a 500-seat auditorium, a Sept. 11 memorial, a reflection space, and a mosque that could attract as many as 2,000 worshipers on Fridays. There is no place like it in the city, which is home to 600,000 to 700,000 Muslims, according to Columbia University researchers.
There are an estimated 2.5 million Muslims in the United States, according to the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
The World Trade Centre was not Muslim.
Do not replace it with something Muslim.
I am getting sick and tired of people saying Muslims may be offended.
SO WHAT?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984
The World Trade Centre was not Muslim.
Do not replace it with something Muslim.
I am getting sick and tired of people saying Muslims may be offended.
SO WHAT?
People who defend the "mosque" for the sake of not offending are not seeing it clearly and are doing it for the wrong reasons. Not offending someone is not my concern. My concern is the First Amendment, and the Declaration of Independance.
It is all about the foundational principles of America. We are at a crossroads. We can choose to continue on the path we are on, and lose that which differentiates our nation and our culture from others. Or we can choose to ignore our foundational principles and instead choose to stifle free speech, freedom of religion, and to hold that all men are NOT created equal.
That is a disgusting travesty. I am saddened and sickened by what I see my nation becoming. All of it justified using the flimsy argument of moral equivalency.
200 years later and I can say we are definitely less insightful as a nation.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
QUESTION: Does one single supporter of that mosque believe for a moment it wont be a celebratory device in the name of the WTC and 9/11?