It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I guess the lesson from those maybe that if you live in a gun owning society it is best not to have any 'no guns allowed' areas.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by dragnet53
No-one has succesfully invaded Britain for nearly a thousand years.
The shear logistics involved with invading the USA would be immense and utter folly, regardless of whether the population is armed or not.
[edit on 4/6/10 by Freeborn]
Originally posted by waynos
Thats correct. Why did Japan not invade the USA? Because its citizens were armed?
Nope.
It was too far away and its Navy was decimated at Midway, thats why.
The Japanese foothold on Alaskan soil placed a new sense of urgency on the completion of the Alcan Highway. U.S. military buildup slowly began when the highway was finished in October 1942. But because of other urgent military needs for the war in Europe and Pacific, troops and equipment were difficult to allocate for an offensive to drive out the invaders.
Read more at Suite101: Alaska Under Attack www.suite101.com...
Well it was one of your countrymen that posted the info that I read about building firearms at home.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
Yes, people can get hold of them, but it takes time and a lot of money and you have to 'know' the right people.
Originally posted by dragnet53
The last country to invade Britain was Rome. But I thought Germany also invaded Britain and won?
Originally posted by IGottaBeMe
I'm for guns and I'm for gun safety. I feel safer knowing that right-minded people can own and carry guns here in the United States.