Guns or No Guns?? Your views., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 3-6-2010 @ 05:45 AM by blupblup
reply to post by CX




I actually agree...I think if people want them to go shooting, hunting, clay pigeon or to a rifle/gun range and so on, then that's fine.
I know that's kind of how it is now, but you know after this, they're going to try and say they we need to just outlaw guns altogether... which is just silly.

As you said, we don't have guns at home for protection and we don't just carry them around and never did before.
It's only people who go shooting at ranges and so on who have them.

This guy was a licensed owner so no laws would have prevented it.


reply posted on 3-6-2010 @ 06:03 AM by LiveForever8
I have never been a proponent of the legalisation of guns in Britain - mainly due to the current 'gun culture' that is apparent over here, something that is also evident in the US.

However the idea of a rational, gun educated populace who respect the responsibility of owning a gun (albeit unrealistic) is something I could accept.

I think Switzerland have the right idea concerning gun control...

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives.

Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition which they are required to keep at home.

Once discharged, men serve in the Swiss equivalent of the US National Guard, but still have to train occasionally and are given bolt rifles. Women do not have to own firearms, but are encouraged to.


If ever a nation had "a well-regulated militia," it is Switzerland. Nineteenth-century economist Adam Smith thought Switzerland the only place where the whole body of the people had successfully been drilled in militia skills.

Indeed, the militia is virtually synonymous with the nation. "The Swiss do not have an army, they are the army, says one government publication. Fully deployed, the Swiss army has 15.2 men per square kilometre; in contrast, the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. have only .2 soldiers per square kilometre. Switzerland is 76 times denser with soldiers than either superpower. Indeed, only Israel has more army per square kilometre.

Mark Eisenecker, a sociologist from the University of Zurich told BBC News Online that guns are "anchored" in Swiss society and that gun control is simply not an issue.

Some pro-gun groups argue that Switzerland proves their contention that there is not necessarily a link between the availability of guns and violent crime in society.


news.bbc.co.uk...






reply posted on 3-6-2010 @ 06:27 AM by thisguyrighthere
Reply to post by blupblup


You guys did carry them around. They were a popular acessory. Especially for women. You guys had some fantastic little derringers disguised as pillboxes and handbags and other female things.

There is some arms museum in the UK whose curattor is often in documentaries about war and weapons and whenever he's on he shares information about Britains past with firearms so many people up here are too quick to either deny or dismiss. Mostly due to ignorance and age I'm sure. When I'm not a mobile device I'll find more info about the guy and his work.

In short Britain has a huge history with arms for sporting and personal defense and at one time more Britains carried arms for defense than Americans and this currator guy is angry as hell not just for his government stripiing that history from it's people but also at the people for so easilly allowing history to be forgotten or rewritten to suit some image.

Added: I believe this is the museum: www.royalarmouries.org...

Under "Curator's Talks" there are a few firearms related. I'm still trying to find a clip of the "Self-Defense in Britain" documentary I saw on the History Channel but everytime I search I'm inundated with relatively recent gun ranting and cant get to anything older than the ban.

[edit on 3-6-2010 by thisguyrighthere]


reply posted on 3-6-2010 @ 06:33 AM by Kandinsky
Ideally, no guns would be the obvious position to take. That said, it's reality and not ideals that has the loudest voice.

From my point of view, guns don't work in the USA. It's a cultural issue and if I was to live there I'd buy a gun as soon as I was allowed to. US gun culture, in that sense, is self-perpetuating. At the same time, gun ownership is a part of the fabric of being an American...it's complicated cultural identity and unlikely to change.

The Swiss have guns in every house. They don't have the gun crime or shootings that feature in the US or other S.American countries. This is due to their 'gun culture' being wholly different from others. They have an informed context for guns.

Canada has similar gun laws to the UK and have similarly low levels of gun crime. In those nations, a burglar is less likely to be carrying a gun than in the States. People are less likely to be shot or have a need to defend themselves with guns.

On ATS I've often seen the expression of NRA sentiments. In particular, I remember a very well-known member cheerfully dismissing statistical evidence against possession of weapons. Higher death rates? Ha! Higher gun crime? That's why need guns! I think it was you, Blup Blup having the debate with him. I realised then, that the US will always have guns.

Anyway, I've seen many a poster see society as being 'safer' if everyone carries a gun. That's how they see it and they ain't changing. If I live in a country where hardly anyone is armed and people aren't being shot dead everyday, I say it's way safer than a society with gun culture.


reply posted on 3-6-2010 @ 08:17 AM by SeenMyShare
reply to post by queenannie38


QueenAnnie38,
I have half an acre of six foot chain link fence to make a safe place for my dogs to run and play. Outside this six foot chain link fence, about 1/4 mile away a large pack of cyotes live. They have been known to jump my six foot fence and run through the family pets' yard. Now, if one of the dogs were outside when this pack hopped my fence what do you think would happen? I keep a gun, and I would shoot at and into the pack to protect my pets, kids and livestock.

I have a chicken coop that is shut at night, but in the daytime my chickens are free range. I've had foxes come take a chicken in broad daylight. I've had 'possum break into my coop and eat chickens by night. I've also shot 'possums right in my coop. Did you know that they eat the chicken while it's still alive?

I am 35 minutes from the nearest law enforcement agency. If I have a thief, or a rapist, or a nut job trying to get into my house what do you suggest I do? Call the police? I'd be dead and they'd be long gone before any police officer ever got here.

It's not reasonable to suggest that there are no reasons to own guns. I was taught gun safety by my father beginning at 8 years old. I have grandchildren now and have always owned guns but I've never used one on a human being, never even crossed my mind (except maybe on the infant molester who was hiding in the acreage behind my house armed to the teeth).

Gun ownership does not equate to lunatic on a murderous rampage.


reply posted on 3-6-2010 @ 08:30 AM by yoesse
reply to post by blupblup



Guns really aren't the issue. Sanity is really the core of the issue. Unfortunately that issue is in the purview of the "psyche" professions who are also behind the programs being used to manipulate the masses to complacency conformity and addiction. The real problem is the mixture of the two.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 16 days ago with 87 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 9 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 11 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 16 days ago with 57 member flags