It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
I'm an atheist, I don't believe in "god-awakenings". I can reach enlightenment perfectly well without having to ascribe to ancient Hindu tradition.
Originally posted by GTORick
I think the fallacy lies in the idea that because we know acupuncture provokes an anti-inflammatory response in the body that it is the only response it provides. For example, nerves run on electrical signals. It is well known that with an electric charge there exists an electric field, Coulomb force etc. Acupuncture may somehow interact in this way with these fields.
Originally posted by Riposte
And if it's any consolation, I have personally seen, heard, and felt this energy. On a daily basis in fact, which can be quite annoying sometimes.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
It's a personal journey, much like every individual's relationship with (or without) a deity. For me, personally, enlightenment is learning to love life, those around you, and yourself, while constantly trying to make yourself and your world a better place. You should never go out of your way to harm others, you should never stop learning, and you should help anyone possible when given the chance.
It sounds sappy, I know, but that's truly how I feel an enlightened individual should be. Of course, as I said, it's a personal journey, so others have to make their own path and find their own meaning.
EDIT: Kundalini most certainly has to do with god-awakenings. It is tied into the tantric and vedic belief of awakening the vital energies of the body.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
That's not true at all. We can't even do that for most pharmaceuticals, as we don't have a patient's genome in their medical record.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how we diagnose and treat, which is completely understandable not being in the field yourself. Medicine isn't as cut and dry as most other fields of science. We have to go with the most logical and effective answer/treatment first, measure the response, and then decide to continue or discontinue from there.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
And those same ancient physicians gave it properties we know to be false, and ascribed certain diseases to it that we know have other causative agents.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Stress does have a role in ulcers. Chronic stress causes a state of immunodepression, which is what allows H. pylori to wreak havoc when normally it would be a transient and asymptomatic infection. THIS is what the discoverer was explaining, not that stress was a red herring.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Not likely. Most of what we were learning 100 years ago from today is considered knowledgeable and a solid groundwork for science. About this time one hundred years ago, we were discovering proteins, nucleic acids, hormones, and the more obscure functions of endocrine glands.
He gives a
complete description of modes of infection in TB, with emphasis on
inhalation of the bacterium. As far as treatment is concerned: ``The
cure of tuberculosis is a question of nutrition; digestion and
assimilation control the situation; make the patient grow fat, and
the local disease may be left to take care of itself.''
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
I've had patients who could feel insects crawling on their skin everyday, despite no insects being present. I'm sure that's annoying, too.
Originally posted by Riposte
Ok well that's not enlightenment. It's just your personal sappy New Age inspired feel-good happy version.
Enlightenment is the permanent dissolution of the mind, i.e., ego. The end of all attachments and desires.
I don't really know what a god awakening is supposed to mean. Kundalini is simply conscious energy. Which you say does not exist, and I can promise you it does.
Originally posted by Riposte
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
I've had patients who could feel insects crawling on their skin everyday, despite no insects being present. I'm sure that's annoying, too.
Flesh out your point here. Are you calling me insane? A liar?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Ok well that's not enlightenment. It's just your personal condescending neo-Vedic inspired pseudo-intellectual version.
Gee, pushing my baseless opinion about an entirely emotional experience is fun!
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
No, I was pointing out that the brain can simulate sensation without any actual sensory input;
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Please explain to me how, within the laws of physics, biology, and chemistry, an energetic imbalance can create a pathologic infection of bacteria and viruses out of thin air. Also, explain how, within these laws, such an infection can be cured by sticking a needle in your back. These are the claims made in traditional Chinese clinics, as well as by some on this board.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Are you trying to tell me that if you had their genome in hand you could tell whether or not they would be subject to the placebo effect? Because I was under the impression we did not know the genes responsible for that effect. The other things, you are presumably saying we DO know genes that control those responses, and if you DID have a genome in their chart you COULD tell.
But the bottom line is, even if you did have their genome you couldnt tell, true?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
e]
Oh trust me, I am not "in the field" but I have been to doctors long enough to understand how inexact a science it is. Not to mention anyone who wants to can watch House and his crew doing exactly what you just described every Monday night.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Western medicine right this very minute is claiming certain diseases are caused by factors that we will later find to be inaccurate. True? Or false?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Does stress cause ulcers without H. Pylori? I have been under enormous stress, and not ever had an ulcer. Stress does not cause ulcers. Or if it does, stress causes any number of illnesses and conditions including cancer. Are you willing to say stress causes cancer? Or the flu? Or hepatitis? Or HIV? It may play a role in weakening the immune system, but it is not the cause. True? Or False? Or are we just redefining "cause" now?
For Western medicine, you will make excuses, and take the broad view, and consider contributing factors, but when it is Chi, and ancient terminology, you hold them to absolute standards, word for word, to the letter.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
I disagree. You think "most" of what they thought back them was "solid groundwork" because they only teach you the theories that turned out to have merit. You should see all the foolishness that didnt make it into your text books. The history of science is fascinating, and amusing.
Scientific American in every issue gives us quick looks back 50, 75, and 100 years, but not always at medicine. However a quick google will give you all kinds of stuff to giggle at.
www.ima.org.il...
Like this from a medical text book,
He gives a
complete description of modes of infection in TB, with emphasis on
inhalation of the bacterium. As far as treatment is concerned: ``The
cure of tuberculosis is a question of nutrition; digestion and
assimilation control the situation; make the patient grow fat, and
the local disease may be left to take care of itself.''
www.wattpad.com...
See when it is our science, the art YOU practice, you recognize that things build on older ideas. That terms change over time, and that knowledge grows. That it is imperfect, and that our knowledge is evolving.
But when it is something you call "mystic" you arent as generous.
Originally posted by Riposte
It's not an entirely emotional experience. Emotion has nothing to do with it.
Regardless, it can't be described in literal nor metaphorical terms. It is beyond any understanding of the mind. It has nothing at all to do with the intellect.
Originally posted by Atlantican
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
When it comes to validity of studies that are based on scientific faith I simply ask... Are eggs good or bad for you now?
Strange it is because I always thought that the area around punctured skin becomes inflamed!
Obviously, there is no mystical energy flowing through us
No, I was pointing out that the brain can simulate sensation without any actual sensory input;
Originally posted by dalan.
Maybe that's because that "sensory input" is coming from someplace/something that scientists are not looking at.
Like that energy you like to brush off as "magical."