It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by freighttrain
UPDATE ---
I don't know how posting my name will help? Other then exposing myself!
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by freighttrain
UPDATE ---
I don't know how posting my name will help? Other then exposing myself!
Viral marketing, of course. "Hey, Mr Publisher, look at all the names clamoring in support of Judy's new book - 'How I discovered the now sadly unprovable signal from space, and the powers that be COVERED IT UP!'"
Plus it's a great mailing list! Win-win baby!
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by ickylevel
But your explanation for the word spectrum is not relevant.
Oh yes it is.
You probably ignore that spectrum has several meaning. One of them if just the "enumeration" of the differents "type" of frequency that exists (like gamma rays, visible light, micro waves). This is the total spectrum , not the spectrum of something emited(for example) by an element (what your are talking about).
If you accept that definition of spectrum, Judy's statement remains just as idiotic as in any other interpretation. Seriously. Gamma rays cannot "give off" "radio emissions".
Originally posted by cosmicpixie
So it is obviously the same Judy Faltskog Wayne's been talking with and on all these sites she said the same thing about her occupation and it's the same Judy who has been found on several of those sites belonging to different organizations that have Astronomers input their obs (eg Seti@home)and she clocked up a fair amount of hours over those sites with her contributions and the dates on at least one go back some years. On the seti@home site her profile links to her website so it's the same woman.
So - she is obviously an Astronomer and one who happens to be really into the UFO scene . We know also that she has given some radio interviews.
Originally posted by Pr0t0
Not to say this is not a hoax, it more than likely is, or a misinterperetation or misunderstanding, but I just wanted to address some concerns about how a deep UV signal can be picked up via radio telescope.
Originally posted by Pr0t0
reply to post by Bedlam
It is true. A simple Google search will bring up this info. It doesn't have to form a picture as you would consider in a traditional optical telescope, but the signature of the light can be read all the same.
Originally posted by smurfy
A UV signal from outer space most likely, would not be received on the ground, unless Dr Judy is on some other tack. On the other hand Hubble can see UV and with it's updates that might include the use of fibre optics in some process that we don't know about. Alexis can see extreme UV and IR and may include ability to see other parts of the ES. Satellites that are not obstensibly dedicated telescopes, could have any capabilty not known to us. Anything in orbit around Earth is a potential staging post to record and retransmit back to Earth.
[edit on 4-5-2010 by smurfy]
Originally posted by Pr0t0
reply to post by Bedlam
It is true. A simple Google search will bring up this info. It doesn't have to form a picture as you would consider in a traditional optical telescope, but the signature of the light can be read all the same.
Anything past x-ray will move through the telescope unnoticed, but the signature of anything resonating at lower frequencies can be detected in many new telescopes, and it's that signature that they're talking about, not a visible image.
anybody else consider this possibility?
Originally posted by reject
reply to post by A boy in a dress
uh oh... I think someone has a huge crush on our phage
anyway, I got bored and thought because this isn't firsthand information, maybe they misunderstood her.
maybe she meant their radiotelescopes zeroed in on celestial bodies with ultraviolet excess and detected artificial patterns in the radio signals
oh well; we can dream, right?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by nenothtu
Sigh....ok, if people like you still want to argue on the fact that the OP used the generic term of radio telescope as a smoking gun, i cannot stop you guys. BUT Deny ignorance is the motto here.
Originally posted by dualsweat
What are you guys talking about? Radio waves ARE light waves...
All you need is a receiver and you can tune it to detect whatever band you want :-p