It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Viacom is one of America's largest media conglomerates. It owns the CBS and UPN broadcast networks, Simon & Schuster publishing, Paramount Studios, and more than 200 radio and television stations, including many in major markets. It also controls a sizeable share of the talk radio business.
Among Viacom's many media holdings on cable television are VH1 and MTV. It owns Nickelodeon and Noggin for children, Black Entertainment Television (BET), Showtime, the Movie Channel, Spike TV for men (formerly TNN), Comedy Central, and Country Music Television (CMT).
Most of these outlets favor the Democratic Party. MTV sponsored the liberal "Rock the Vote" voter-registration drive. In 2004 CMT continued to promote the left activist band the Dixie Chicks as they toured to raise money for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry; by contrast, the network refused to air a patriotic song by the Charlie Daniels Band. Each weeknight Comedy Central airs The Daily Show, a popular satiric newscast anchored by comic Jon Stewart, who interviews usually progressive political guests and ridicules conservatives and Republicans...
One hallmark of Viacom management has been the promotion of political ideology so leftward that one critic described the company's executives as "Viacommies." In February 2001 two Viacom executives -- the President and Chief Executive Officer of CBS Les Moonves and CEO of MTV Tom Freston -- were in Havana for a private dinner and meeting with Communist dictator Fidel Castro.
Viacom Chairman Sumner Redstone, who turned 70 in 2004, has described himself as a "liberal Democrat" and has been a major financial contributor to Democrats, as are eight other members of Viacom's Board of Directors. (Two Viacom Board members served in President Bill Clinton's Cabinet.)
In 1996 the Walt Disney Company purchased Capital Cities/ABC for $18.5 billion. At that point, ABC's politics shifted noticeably to the left. Whereas during the Vietnam War era the station had sometimes been disparaged by the anti-war left as the "Silent Majority Network" because its coverage was often more positive and patriotic than that aired by NBC and CBS, ABC became more leftist than the others in tone and content following its acquisition by Disney.
The host chosen in June 2002 to anchor ABC's Sunday news program "This Week" after the departure of broadcasting icon David Brinkley was George Stephanopoulos, a left Democratic partisan who served as Senior Advisor and Press Secretary in President Bill Clinton's White House. This show remains home to one of ABC's only two identified personalities on the political right -- Washington Post columnist George Will. (The other is John Stossel, an anchor of "20/20," who is a Libertarian.) Will used to appear as the principal commentator on "This Week," but with Stephanopoulos in control Will's role has been greatly diminished.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by nenothtu
Just how hot does the water have to get in which this frog boils before you announce that it's soup? A "few socialist-esque laws"? How many does it take? What is your personal cutoff line, before you admit the obvious?
You are right. We were destined for Socialism soon after we instituted fire and police protection and levied taxes against the public to pay for it.
[edit on 28-4-2010 by maybereal11]
I'm sorry, I don't think I heard you correctly. Obviously, I'm not quite grasping your meaning.
How is it, precisely, that you equate my local law enforcement and fire departments, paid out of local coffers, with the centralization of power in DC that comes with the socialist tendencies of our federal government that we've seen increasing these last 30 years?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by nenothtu
[
I'm sorry, I don't think I heard you correctly. Obviously, I'm not quite grasping your meaning.
How is it, precisely, that you equate my local law enforcement and fire departments, paid out of local coffers, with the centralization of power in DC that comes with the socialist tendencies of our federal government that we've seen increasing these last 30 years?
Those local law enforcement and fire departments receive federal funds to subsidize equipment and training, and they are required to follow certain federally mandated guidelines.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Oh, I am sorry I did not realize that your defintion of socialism was contingent on geography and scale.
That is a bit confusing to me.."socialism" is not "socialism" if it is at the state level? Hmmm...
I think you are taking a states-rights position and spinning in socialism because...well I am not sure why...maybe because some talking head told you to? Please explain the whole concept of how something cannot be "socialist" if it is at the state-level.
Originally posted by piddles
reply to post by jdub297
yeah this reform is going to destroy everything because the system we have now works pretty well
Originally posted by klaybient
So, health care insurance, whether it is provided by the government or a private company is a tax.
In the end, whether you are paying a public or private tax, you still have to pay money to get it.
Obamas plan is limited, because there is such extreme opposition (public & private) to a single payer system, thus he must try and work around the private health care insurance industry, which is headed towards ruin.
Why not stop now, before it's too late and try and improve things for your country and your children's future?
Minimal government is a great idea for small societies with excess resources and land, but for somewhere as overcrowded as America, it is entirely inappropriat
[edit on 28-4-2010 by klaybient]
Originally posted by piddles
great another "DO WHAT WE DO OR GIT DA HELL OUT" asshole who thinks he's the sum of America's opinion while exaggerating something that couldn't even be the truth to begin with.
fyi a few socialist-esque laws is not a socialist dictatorship but as long we're out of sync with what is actual reality, let's just tell everyone our current system is fine and the US wasn't having any problems until the socialist muslim moved in (lol)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
The guys who say they love the 3rd HC option of not getting insurance at all...you're egoistic dicks. The economic crisis got even worse thanks to people like you because they lost their house or couldn't pay off their debt because they got sick and couldn't pay their healthcare bills (or use all their funds to do so). It's one of the major causes of foreclosures, and it hurt the other citizens of the US...so if someone forces you to pay for HC insurance...I say, GOOD!
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by klaybient
So, health care insurance, whether it is provided by the government or a private company is a tax.
No. A tax is paid to government. A voluntary transaction with a company is not a tax.
Originally posted by maybereal11
There is nothing volountary about cancer or a heart-attack or trips to the emergency room.
If cancer, car accidents, disease etc. obeyed the rules of capitalism and free markets...somehow struck only those who could afford it, when they could afford it then you might have a case.
Disease has not correlation to capitlaisitic mechanisms. From the begining if time every tribe that gathered to form a community understood this and cared for there sick rather than drag them off into the bushes to die.
Disease fits nowhere in the capitalisitc equation. That is the irony. It was never meant to be a capitalistic enterprise to begin with...by objective analysis the state of our healthcare in this country was more of a massive shake-down operation and criminal in nature. Socialism has nothing to do with it either.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
So just because you were lucky and didn't get seriously ill, and because you don't have debt means the whole accusation is hogwash? Look it up, people not being able to cover medical bills was one of the prime reasons for foreclosures.
I'm happy you're healthy,
but the idiot down the street who isn't insured and smokes 2 packs a day probably isn't. And when he can't pay his medical bills should he get cancer (and I don't wish that on anyone), his house will be foreclosed. That'll put more pressure on the housing market and the economy as a whole. If the economy does badly, people lose jobs...yes, people like me and you.
Thinking only about yourself in today's world is incredibly egotistical, everything's connected economically, and if someone screws up, it harms others.
Looking forward to your not paying strategy though...whatever you do, don't pick up the soap!