reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
Not to mention, the OP has already been demolished.
Your quick to claim premature victory when the OS (or TOL = the Official Lie) can't even stand up to scruitny by it's own panel members who call it
a lie. And they created the darn thing!
Fact: The OS is not complete.
Fact: The OS panel refused to accept evidence collected & presented to the panel. Why? because it (the panel) was not intended to be a evidence fact
Fact: The OS is not evidentuary in it's findings.
Fact: The OS was not intended to place blame nor be used as evidence as many of those who support falsely claim it is.
Fact: If the OS were presented as "evidence" in a courtroom it would be rejected as hearsay because nothing contained in it follows the proceadures
required by a court of law guideline for evidence collection & presentation requirements. Even though again, the report is not and was not intended to
be a source of evidence.
While many who support the OS continue to say its the final word, thats true in one context. And that is its the final word of the administration who
was forced to throw some form of explanation together as a result of their own initial story regarding what happened on 911. The result of that
pressure is a panel report that is flawed beyond words.
OS'ers who support the official story are backing the government that has failed to provide evidence they say they have, but have refused to release
it for any examination by anyone. The "evidence" as the FBI says, "is classified" and that begs the question of why is it classified if it were
nothing more than an act of terorism by 19 hijackers against the United States?
Question: if flight 93 was not shot down then why can't we hear the recording from the military jets who intercepted it?
Question: If 911 was nothing more than a terrorist attack on the US by 19 hijackers then why can't the evidence be released to prove it once & for
all and stop any conspiracy theoirys to the contrary?
Question: Why did the FBI refuse to believe that any debris was in Indian lake and only after hearing additional reports of such, go there and look
the day after?
Question: Why is the recording played at ZM's trial of flight 93 being kept from the public?
Question: Why did they remove all of the WTC rubble in NYC before anyone could examine it when claims were made as to the use of demolitions? *they
did the same thing in OKC also**
Question: Why did the FBI discount the second plane in PA after multiple witnesses stated they saw it? Then they recanted after several news storys
ran in the national media showing the plane?
I can go on and I know you don't have the answers to those questions because the agencys involved cannot even answer them, it demonstrates why this
OS is full of holes and why all Americans need to ask the questions in the face of ignorance regarding the 911 OS.
[edit on 21-1-2010 by mikelee]