reply to post by without_prejudice
I believe this is a perfect example of someone trying to play both sides and make a few bucks in the process. He pretends to be leading the
Truth movement on, but in fact is still shilling for the official story. Just another con man.
BF: Thanks, Keith. Yeah, and did you get to look at those tapes from the Pentagon, John?
JF: Yes, we did, and- and, uh, I know there's been a lot of speculation about, um, about, you know, whether a plane actually hit the Pentagon- I can
assure you that it did.
How can he assure us it did, he hasn’t yet?
And, um, and they were actually able to reconstruct, uh, large components of the plane,
Most of us, know that was a proven lie. What large components? To whom does he think he is fooling? There were no photos of large pieces of
airplane ever photograph.
This is what you call a sales man selling snake oil.
someone who was a member of my team was a naval intelligence officer in the Pentagon that morning, uh, was severely burned,
Someone? This someone has no name? Notices how he changes the topic right away from airplane parts to this someone?
in his unit was killed, and, and, had uh,
Notice the “and, and, had uh” you will see lairs do the same thing when they are searching for a lie to tell, “and, and, had uh.” Yeah uh
right, uh, we should believe in uh, this, uh man and uh, take is uh, um, lets see, you know, you believe me, don’t you?
he has, he has no doubt that a plane hit the Pentagon.
The interviewer was asking Farmer if a plane hit the pentagon, not um, oh yeah, uh, someone with no name. Farmer answers to the questions hold no
water for verifiable creditable evidence.