It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dgtempe
A small amount will do battle with their own, but there is talk many law officials will NOT side with the government, hence, again, FOREIGN TROOPS WILL BE THE HIT PEOPLE.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Couple of things.
1. Is the European Union Times a real news site? Looks like a blog to me..
2. The other articles don't speak of the same language in the first..
3. WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THE US NEED CANADIAN TROOPS??? ... No offense to our Canadian brothers, but uh ... if the US military cannot handle US citizens running amok in the cities, what the hell makes us think Canadians can??
4. California is full of illegal immigrants and thus their life would go back to what it was pre-invading the US, and hyper Liberals who wouldn't know how to rebel to begin with .. I don't see California being a huge disaster.. they will go broke (again) .. whine about it.. get bailed out (again) carry on their socialist ways (of course) until they go broke and whine (again) ..
Unless..... we sell California to Canada!! .. no no .. I like the Canadians to much to do that to them..
Obama's "OPM" last job was...... managing Zoos. I think we can take him.
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by willow1d
The article says NATO, yet you say UN. They are two totally different organisations.