Fluoride's here but Graham's gone , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 52 times
Topic started on 17-12-2009 @ 12:45 PM by DimensionalDetective

Fluoride's here but Graham's gone


www.themorningbulletin.com.au
“For the last 15 years I have worked at the Glenmore Water Treatment Plant operating the chemical dosing of water taken from the Fitzroy River for the city’s consumption,” Graham said.

“Until now all processes adopted have made the water either clean or safe to consume.

“Fluoride addition does neither and questionably compromises the safety aspect.

“With this ethical, plus a few moral issues, I realised my present position was untenable.”
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 17-12-2009 @ 08:41 PM by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by Happyfeet



I am both proud and disheartened at the same time from reading this.

On the one hand I was grinning from ear to ear seeing a fellow citizen step up and become proactive in trying to end this type of biological warfare that is being imposed upon us.

On the other hand, the end result almost identically mirrors what we are dealing with on a federal governmental level---People plugging their ears and going "la-la-la, we're not listening to you peons."

Thank you so much for trying. You are a testament to the fact that our current bureaucratic system is broken down at every concievable level, and that those at the top of each chain could not give a hoot about the masses they are supposed to be representing, clear down to their VERY HEALTH.

This is truly alarming and disgusting at the same time. We have a RIGHT to drink non-chemicalized water, despite what ANY of those in power try and tell us!

[edit on 17-12-2009 by DimensionalDetective]


reply posted on 17-12-2009 @ 11:26 PM by PRS395
reply to post by Happyfeet




This is truly insane.

You are exactly right D D. No one in Government listens to, US, We the People.



I thought the same thing when I went to the water company to pay my bill.
These employees just do what they are told and dump fluoride into our water. As long as they are getting their paycheck.

I tend to question everything since I love learning, whatever it may be. I just don't get it with people, To find out what and why.

[edit on 17-12-2009 by PRS395]



reply posted on 17-12-2009 @ 11:54 PM by ziggy1706
R/O is Reverse Osmosis* They make them in countertop units, and for whole house units, installed at the water in line. They utilize generally between 3 to 6 filters depending on model to squeeze water through membranes, kinda like a cermaic filter, effectively eliminating 98% of EVERYTHING from the water. Problem is, they waste wae, you normaly get a gallon of water for every 3 wasted.Reveers osmosis stores filtered watr in a tank connected to it, whereas any other water filter syste, is ust a single plass carbon block or GAC ( granular activated charcoal) filter.
Reverse osmosis also removes minerals your body needs. SO in essence, reverse osmosis makes * distilled water*
Thier are waer distillers yo could buy, not as expensive as reverse osmosis systems, but smae principal applys, it removes pretty much everything from the water. OF course, you could substitute the mineral enigma with moneral pills* but wont be the same.
I myself right now, just use a 10 inch tall double filter carbon block system on kitchen sink, cause thats where i use the most water. I do use a shower filter, from Crystal quest, as in my online research is the closest you will comes inexpensivly. Someone else in another post, showed a website, a shower fitler exclusivly for reducing fluoride form shower, but at $188! kinda pricey*
The most economical and efficiant wayt o clean yuor water, before it goes through the entire home plumbing system, is to have fitlers set up at the inline* befoe the water gets to the hot water heater. MY sink fitler, i use a .5 to .2 micron carbon block, and 2nd housing i use activated alumina i belive it is..which half the media is rated at 600 gallons of fluoride removal, probably at 60% reduction, and the other half is GAC, claning up the water before making it to the activated alumina.
Activated alumina, is a newer technology, more or less, dsgined to capture fluoride, but its not 100% reverse osmosis will capture much more. It seesm the ONLY way to effectively remove fluoride, is that it is NOT introduced at all, to the water system in the first place. Fluroide is not easy at all, to remove from water.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags