It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by downisreallyup
The people who scream "IT CAN'T POSSIBLY WORK" are those who have A) never looked into it with an open mind, B) have no knowledge of it at all, or C) are simply parrots, trumpeting the squawk of the gawking flock!
Please, let us be better than that... let us dream, postulate, question, hypothesize, experiment, build, and PROVE that something either CAN or CANNOT be done! Thank you
Science can explain why electrons spin endlessly. There is no power INPUT, that's true, however, there is none needed. Something called 'strong nuclear force' is holding a given atom together. The atom is held in what is called a bound state. The atom as a whole has less energy (while bound) than it's constituent particles combined (conservation of energy applies.) So energy has already been applied to bind the atom. The remaining energy is in the form of potential energy. The electron needs no input of energy to orbit, because it has potential energy, and it is not expending energy. The movement comes from attractive force which is related to being bound.
Originally posted by downisreallyup
Bona fide science? Ha ha ha Do you know the first step in the scientific method? Come on, do you? Let me give you a hint... it starts with a "P"...
POSTULATE - in other words, make a theory, in other words, DREAM!
Originally posted by Heros_son
Sir, I do know the scientific method. Postulation is not at the beginning, but toward the end, of the process.
The first step is to ask a question (which is why I value dreaming, and free thinking)
1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.
2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.
3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.
4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.
Originally posted by CrimsonMoon
reply to post by broli
Wow im impressed, its going to be running on demo for weeks with a live internet stream! and it runs on a battery!
Look at the clock on your wall it does the same thing spins for months using only a small battery...
Originally posted by downisreallyup
reply to post by Doglord
Postulation is not the same as hypothesis. To postulate is to make a claim based on logic, reason, and/or intuition... to form a framework for inquiry. Just like in any scientific rigor, postulates/axioms form the assumed basis for inquiry.
If you ASSUME that energy can't come from the unseen space, then you will NEVER make any observance for it. One's postulation is a direct outgrowth of his/her PARADIGM.
It is clear that many here do not DREAM of actually finding a source of apparent FREE energy, while others do. Those who do may actually take the time to observe, hypothesize, and experiment. Those who do not dream of such a thing will NEVER take one step to observe anything about it.
So, my point is clearly made that dreaming/postulating is the PRESTEP to the whole scientific method... in fact, one could say that postulation is the "postulate of the scientific method itself... the assumed part that is missing from the school books."
Yes, in the official scientific method, observance is first, but THERE IS something that comes before that, and that is "dreaming", which could also be the personal "dreams" of the scientist. How else will you know what to observe? I'm sorry, but you need to widen your view here a little, and realize that all science starts with dreams, whether it is the dream to fly, the dream to go deep under the sea, the dream to discover lost civilizations, the dream to explore the universe, the dream to discover new particles, the dream to harness FREE energy... etc.
I am thinking and talking at a much deeper and more philosophical level than you are, for you are merely quoting what anyone can look up on Wikipedia. I am talking from the human perspective as to WHY we want to do science in the first place.
So, while you may desire to think you are correct that "observe" is the first step, I argue flatly that unless you have a dream to precede your observation, you will end up observing nothing more than random tidbits of incoherent chaos.
[edit on 16-12-2009 by downisreallyup]
Originally posted by Heros_son
Do you have any info about the over unity machines or ZPE or anything?
Originally posted by downisreallyup
If you ASSUME that energy can't come from the unseen space, then you will NEVER make any observance for it. One's postulation is a direct outgrowth of his/her PARADIGM.
It is clear that many here do not DREAM of actually finding a source of apparent FREE energy, while others do. Those who do may actually take the time to observe, hypothesize, and experiment. Those who do not dream of such a thing will NEVER take one step to observe anything about it.
So, my point is clearly made that dreaming/postulating is the PRESTEP to the whole scientific method... in fact, one could say that postulation is the "postulate of the scientific method itself... the assumed part that is missing from the school books."
Yes, in the official scientific method, observance is first, but THERE IS something that comes before that, and that is "dreaming", which could also be the personal "dreams" of the scientist. How else will you know what to observe? I'm sorry, but you need to widen your view here a little, and realize that all science starts with dreams, whether it is the dream to fly, the dream to go deep under the sea, the dream to discover lost civilizations, the dream to explore the universe, the dream to discover new particles, the dream to harness FREE energy... etc.
I am thinking and talking at a much deeper and more philosophical level than you are, for you are merely quoting what anyone can look up on Wikipedia. I am talking from the human perspective as to WHY we want to do science in the first place.
So, while you may desire to think you are correct that "observe" is the first step, I argue flatly that unless you have a dream to precede your observation, you will end up observing nothing more than random tidbits of incoherent chaos.
[edit on 16-12-2009 by downisreallyup]
Originally posted by ThePeoplesSoldier
reply to post by Pryde87
en.wikipedia.org...:_Columbus
This is a great read. It is about when EVERYONE ON EARTH KNEW the earth was flat. Traveling to far in the ocean ment certain death!
The common misconception that people before the age of exploration believed that Earth was flat entered the popular imagination after Washington Irving's publication of The Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus in 1828.
The disputed point, therefore, was not the shape of the Earth, nor the idea that going west would eventually lead to Japan and China, but the ability of European ships to sail that far across open seas.
The myth that people of the Middle Ages believed that the Earth was flat entered the popular imagination in the 19th century, thanks largely to the publication of Washington Irving's fantasy The Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus in 1828.[1]
Originally posted by DataWraith
Whilst a good idea it HAS been done before, there are lots and lots of sites all claiming to have 'free energy' devices of varying sorts and types.
'Steorn' do not have any videos or photos displaying their generators and therefore do not gauge my attention.
If there were truly onto something thats productive to Human life and to the environment I feel they would go out of their way to provide proof, and even to provide videos of their devices working.
But all I see from their website is printed words that even I can do.
I own the world but I won't show any signs of papers proving my ownership.
See?
No proof , no truth.
Originally posted by ThePeoplesSoldier
en.wikipedia.org...:_Columbus
This is a great read. It is about when EVERYONE ON EARTH KNEW the earth was flat. Traveling to far in the ocean ment certain death!
edit: oh and day two still going strong! www.steorn.com...
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by gareth01422
Water, key word in hydro dam being "hydro".
Water moves down hill because of it's fluidity, which falls into the realm of fluid-dynamics.