It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheDon
they would not have been able to link the chip to the individual.
Originally posted by marg6043
While I agree with some of the posters that claim the technology for some chips so small as to be injected the truth is that the medical information chips has been available for while, yes right now they are offer with a fee, the last time it was about 200 dollars and it was voluntarily, but with the health care bill it could become the reality for the government tracking health records and for the Chips makers profiteering.
I mean, people if the government gets away with mandatory health insurance of been penalized what will stop them from mandatory implants for easy and accessible record keeping.
Just thing about why I am such and opponent of any legislation that means mandatory.
Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as:
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.”
In “real world speak”, according to this report, this new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the United States the first Nation in the World to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency identification (RFID) microchip for the purpose of controlling who is, or isn’t, allowed medical care in their country.
(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining. In developing the registry, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods for—‘‘(A) including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier
Originally posted by wayno
reply to post by DGFenrir
I was talking about detecting pathogens in the body. It is entirely possible to detect pathogens and other foreign objects in the human bloodstream.
And I was saying that is what our immune systems already do. Our immune systems not only identify but destroy pathogens. You think a thing injected into our bodies is going to do a better job?
Please. If anything our bodies will/should attack the injected thing and destroy it!
Originally posted by Springer
reply to post by factbeforefiction
Start a thread about it and it may end up in the next edition (I happen to know the Director of "ATSnews with Johnny Anonymous" show pretty well )... That's how it works, we report on what the members of ATS are talking about.