|
reply posted on 7-5-2005 @ 08:18 AM by MidnightDStroyer
|
Originally posted by vincere7
To bring this back on topic. Investigation can be deadly if you name names
In that case I think that quite a few people who've used Bush's name in disparaging terms & have written only the truth about him as it's been
publicly documented would have the most to fear...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2005 @ 04:18 PM by vincere7
|
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
In that case I think that quite a few people who've used Bush's name in disparaging terms & have written only the truth about him as it's been
publicly documented would have the most to fear...
You misunderstood what was said, which is good. Naming names coupled with damning evidence. Saying Bush lied is not daming evidence, nor is historical
significance. Providing documents with signatures or more damning, photos of meets, and publishing such or mentioning such - like a Halliburton
representative meeting with certain terrorist cell memebers, would be enough to put you away.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2005 @ 04:49 AM by MidnightDStroyer
|
Actually I think you misunderstood what I previously posted...It was an attempt at humor with a bit of sarcasm.
I'm fully aware that the the truth can set you free, but it can also get you killed.
"For not all true things are the truth...[and] not all true things are to be said to all men."--Bishop Clement of Alexandria
[edit on 8-5-2005 by MidnightDStroyer]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-5-2005 @ 12:26 AM by vincere7
|
Actually your sarcasm has proved true.
James Howard Hatfield, 43, wrote Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President in 1999.
A hotel housekeeper discovered the man's body about noon Wednesday, Springdale police Detective Al Barrios said Thursday. Detective Barrios said the
man apparently overdosed on two kinds of prescription drugs. Original publisher St. Martin's Press Inc. recalled the book after a Dallas Morning News
story about Mr. Hatfield's criminal background , saying it could not trust him, but Soft Skull Press, a small New York firm, reissued it in
paperback.
Probably coincidence -
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 1-6-2005 @ 08:32 AM by cohiba
|
Does somebody have another link to this site, and/or information? I keep getting the Locked
The requested resource is currently locked. The lock must be released or proper identification given before the method can be applied.
message, and after all the praise, I really want to read it!
Thanks in advance... otherwise, I guess I'll just keep trying... maybe it will work eventually.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2005 @ 06:11 PM by MemoryShock
|
I get the same thing.......how unfortunate.......makes me glad I saved a decent chunk to my laptop............
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2005 @ 08:14 PM by DragonsDemesne
|
Locked
The requested resource is currently locked. The lock must be released or proper identification given before the method can be applied
From the comments people are giving about this link, I think it's something I really would be interested in. Is it available anywhere else or does
anyone know how to get around that 'locked' thing?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-6-2005 @ 10:38 PM by makeitso
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-6-2005 @ 05:11 AM by DragonsDemesne
|
You have voted makeitso for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
 Thanks for finding that link, makeitso! There's probably a few other members like me who didn't get a chance to look at it earlier before it
got locked up, that will be interested.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 05:43 AM by ADVISOR
|
First time
Was wondering and it did it, now I get to play the waiting game.
Locked
The requested resource is currently locked. The lock must be released or proper identification given before the method can be applied.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 06:09 AM by ConspiracyNut23
|
Thanks for bringing this thread back up, that is an excellent site indeed. The original link is still locked for me, but the
link provided by Makeitso works fine.
Looks like very good reading, thanks Infinite/Makeitso.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2006 @ 03:44 PM by ConspiracyNut23
|
Looks like the guy is a member of ATS
www.abovetopsecret.com...
He is confused where his thread went.
[edit on 4/5/06 by ConspiracyNut23]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2006 @ 06:47 PM by Bibliophile
|
The link is locked right now.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-5-2006 @ 08:06 AM by ConspiracyNut23
|
Ok I’m a bit confused. This thread is praising the article The Dangers of Investigating Conspiracies and Cover-ups (and the surrounding
site)
The article was originally found here:
home1.gte.net...
Now it is found here:
www.ahealedplanet.net...
So it appears Wade Frazier is the author of the article. It also appears that he is a
member of ATS.
He doesn’t have enough points to post here, but he would probably be the best to answer why it’s locked. He probably put it there, and then moved
it to another domain. Maybe the member could be given access so he can comment, no?
I’m I missing something? Is the author of The Dangers of Investigating Conspiracies and Cover-ups and wadefrazier3 the same
person?
EDIT:
I went ahead and asked him about the locked site, he said:
A year and a half ago, I moved onto a permanent domain, and my old site address died when I moved hosts. With a domain, my site’s address
should stay the same as long as there is an Internet and I am on the planet.
Enigma of the locked site solved.
[edit on 5/5/06 by ConspiracyNut23]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2006 @ 11:25 PM by wadefrazier3
|
Hello:
Thanks to some appreciated effort by ConspiracyNut23, this thread has been moved to where I can see it. Sorry that the old site went away, but when I
moved residences, Verizon did not serve my new neighborhood, so the old address disappeared. However, back in 2004 I obtained a domain, so the
address of my site should be permanent now. I see the interest died down when my site changed addresses. Maybe this will rekindle it.
I don’t see anything on the thread that needs a response right now. Partly because of ConspiracyNut23’s efforts, I have put up a thread designed
to initiate discussion of my work with interested members of this ATS.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I can respond on either thread. As is evident in my work, I interlink between sections of my site intensely, and I am sorry if that style conflicts
with the ATS way. I hope I can have a little indulgence on this matter, for perhaps a little while.
Best,
Wade Frazier
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-7-2006 @ 04:58 PM by Mr_Peel
|
I was sent off on a tangent yesterday, searching for information about a guy named Phil Schneider and it appears he was murdered in 1996, after
speaking openly about something called the "Dulce war(s)."
Supposedly this guy's dad was a key operative in the Philadelphia Experiment.
anyway, that's one example of a death conceiveably caused by exposing secrets...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-11-2006 @ 03:26 AM by waterwalker
|
OR THIS IS A GOVERMENT SITE WHICH KEEP TABS ON US?WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2006 @ 01:07 PM by citykitty
|
Thanks for the information!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-12-2006 @ 11:43 PM by defenceexpert
|
---
i watch the watchman and it is a Government site with civilian access.
MDIA Special Agent
AUS/USA
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2006 @ 08:34 PM by Arm Of Geddon
|
Originally posted by defenceexpert
i watch the watchman
Who watches you watch the watchman?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
There is no immediate danger in investigating conspiracies. The danger comes in when you get the idea to share that information with a large
audience. It gets even more dangerous if you are credible and have some kind of credentials. And it's extremely dangerous if you have evidence on
top of it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |