As this perp faces the "Wowsome" 120 days for "attempted Murder", As I see it,
Another "perp" faces an Astonishing 90 days for helping the homeless.
Info at this ATS Thread
Can you imagine?
This belongs in the US Poolitical Madness Board for sure.
It is an ongoing problem here in America.
Chastize and incarcerate those who bend over backwards to help their fellow human brothers and sisters, as well as sentencing those convicted of
simple possession of such plants as hemp to extraordinarily harsh terms, typically akin to a 1st degree capital felony, while the real felons and
those who plague society with endangerment using strong-arm tactics and weapons against fellow citizens more and more often are briefly held and even
let out early in lotteries and for behaving while in the joint.
This trend and the trend of rewarding big corp failure, fraud and those corrupt individuals who testify in seeming sincerity while slitting throats
from their offices down the hall with feverish rapidity.
All the while, constituants demanding changes in the Rockefellorian drug laws and in a overwhelming united voice demand representatives to negate the
beggings for bailouts and threats should they not comply, are completely disenfranchised in treasonous fashion, without even being allowed redress on
To put it in perspective, let me draw a comparison that can be broken down to one basic word.
Here, an article on climate,
Very Bad News on Climate Front
Purports that a study
reconstructs the accumulation of industrial carbon in the oceans year by year, from 1765 to 2008
What is the result of the study?
Today, the oceans hold about 150 billion tons of industrial carbon, the researchers estimate--a third more than in the mid-1990s."
What steps were taken to arrive at this estimate?
Khatiwala and his co-researchers developed techniques to infer quantities of industrial carbon in the oceans
What were the techniques developed?
Well, this information is conveniently left out of the report.
But the interesting admission is that the developed techniques (and I quote) "infer".
Regarding this usage of a word that may often be skimmed over without much thought of it's use, and this type of serrogate diction may be
thoughtfully placed by purposed intent, negating the inclusive skullduggery of blatant fictive fein.
Let's define this key word that makes this study sound convincingly authentic, as if peer reviewed with precise notes, data and real science were
behind the conclusions announced resulting from the study.
Then we will give a couple examples of it's usage.
First the definition(s):
2. To offer, as violence. [Obs.] --Spenser.
3. To bring forward, or employ as an argument; to adduce; to
allege; to offer. [Obs.]
Full well hath Clifford played the orator,
Inferring arguments of mighty force. --Shak.
4. To derive by deduction or by induction; to conclude or
surmise from facts or premises; to accept or derive, as a
consequence, conclusion, or probability; as, I inferred
his determination from his silence.
Now to see it's usage applied:
To infer is nothing but by virtue of one proposition
laid down as true, to draw in another as true.
The first part is not the proof of the second, but
rather contrariwise, the second inferreth well the
first. --Sir T. More.
As we see, to "infer" is to deduce, surmise, basically to hypothize a notion as if it were the truth, whether scientific, mathematical or other
device known to repetitively end with the same results.
But, rather than opposing or contrary to insanity, which could be the case if this were an actual verifiable scientific result, this word describes or
should I say, defines exaclty what it is supposed to define.
Simply put, it is a round-about way of saying "we pretended that our techniques were accurate, but in reality, we are merely guessing; assuming;
imagining; selling Sh*t in a brown paper bag.
If we associate, corrolate or note simularities between this type of "research" and the ass-backwards way that these courts sentence crimes, which,
rather than a sentence befitting the criminal act, judgement is heavily applied to non-violent and IMHO innocent behavior that has been lobbied into a
crime of some sinister porportion while true justice is thrown out the window allowing real, violent and truly disturbing crimes against society is
whitewashed with punishments more of the nature of what you may expect from a gross misdemeaner than a class A felony.
This wacky inverted trend is deafening and becoming louder and louder each passing day. The Courts are replacing Judges with Jesters and the few
good judges left are a dying breed worthy of our appreciation.
The rest are....well...the two afore mentioned sentences speak volumes on the down-spiralling of our once healthy jurisprudence and Nation.
You see, Our Nation, founded on Christian principles, is now but a current day sodom, soon to end if we do not arrive at the crossroads and change the
path we are taking.
It may take the dismissal of the entire Congress toabout-face and stop the insanity, or, it may take but a few good men and women.
It certainly doesn't help that shooting a person is a 4 month jailable offense and helping 30 humans in desperate need is a 3 month jailable
We need some good old fashioned regulators. Some young guns who dish out justice with integrity and common sense for the good of the people. Maybe
the Sheen family will ride again.