It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
Your selective and deceptive "quotes" can't buttress a false position.
There is no such thing as an "AIDS" virus. I can't prove a negative. Show me one.
By definition, AIDS ( a "syndrome") is a collection of symptoms and observations that are related to failure of the immune system to attack otherwise defensible pathogens.
It's as if the immune system is "worn out," or gives up" to normal crap that can turn into something bad, when it wouldn't otherwise. It is "acquired."
AIDS is not a necessary consequence of HIV, although the virus renders the host susceptible to one or more of any infections that most people easily fend off. "AIDS" is a handy tag or label to seek funding and attention. In and of itself, it is meaningless. It is nothing more than a DESCRIPTION!
Happy?
jw
[edit on 22-11-2009 by jdub297]
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by jdub297
Yep, I agree.
I'm not really up to speed on the arguments. It seems like semantics is part of the problem.
People can have HIV and not have AIDS. Aids is a diagnosis when you happen to have HIV and other diseases. The AIDS numbers jumped rapidly in woman when cervical cancer was added to the list. We then were told that the AIDS virus had exploded amongst the female population. More diseases have been added to the list.
They are then called AIDS patients. And treated as such. I don't know but something seems wrong about that.
I've also heard that that HIV is often misdiagnosed?
I'm not qualified to argue it. So I won't. But I've heard some strong cases.
Originally posted by squiz
Ok, my ignorance has muddled the claims.
The prize is for the isolation of pure HIV. oops.
The dissenters have differing opinions. Some claim that HIV has not been properly isolated. Some do. Some say HIV does not cause AIDS.
But have the original references that conclusively connect HIV to AIDS actually been found as Kary claims? or is it all after the rules where set?
www.virusmyth.com...
Anyone wanna crack?
[edit on 22-11-2009 by squiz]
Etienne de Harven, MD, Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto
PROBLEMS WITH ISOLATING HIV
How can we best help Africa? How can we set priorities aimed at bringing under control what is described as an AIDS epidemic? For twenty years, all AIDS research has been based on the HIV hypothesis. Do we now have reasons to question this hypothesis? Yes, because there is a major problem with isolation and purification of HIV. The major problem being that, in spite of innumerable claims to the contrary, this retrovirus has never been isolated nor purified in a scientifically acceptable manner that would satisfy the classic requirements of virology.
Originally posted by squiz
Posted the wrong link sorry.
Well, I am just a layman. When I hear a number of academics question whether it has actually been isolated to the conditions met for virology.
All I can do is say is that the issue it is not resolved. If the egg heads can't agree. We won't resolve it here.
From what I understand, it can't be clearly categorized as a retrovirus?
Not sure.
I'm just willing to listen to the arguments and make what I can out of my limited knowledge in the area. Not Much I afraid.
[edit on 22-11-2009 by squiz]
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
I don't think that is a fair comparison. I don't think these guys are nut jobs. And consensus does not equal scientific fact. Perhaps they have higher standards for empirical evidence?
[edit on 22-11-2009 by squiz]
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
Collect the prize? seems fair, isolate the virus according to the original requirements. And the professor above doesn't seem to think so?
It's not about providing evidence it's the lack of it that seems to be the problem.
[edit on 22-11-2009 by squiz]
Originally posted by squiz
Sounds like they need to isolate HIV to classify it as a retrovirus.
Don't you want the cash?
Barré-Sinoussi and Montagnier discovered HIV in the lymph nodes of recently infected patients. It was being produced in large quantities in white blood cells and it induced the death of cells of a kind that was missing in patients suffering from AIDS. HIV was like a chameleon. Each patient carried a unique virus variant, which could hide in the host cell genome. Barré-Sinoussi and Montagnier's discovery explained the progression of the disease and its communicability, enabling them to establish the connection between HIV and AIDS.
Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the "Bundesgesundheitsbehrde",
the Federal German Health Authorities, which says that in connection with
AIDS there has never been isolated a virus (Dr. Marcus,
Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) Berlin). The judge figured out that the
German Bundestag had been backing the lie of the Federal Health
Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a successful isolation of a
virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a petition (Art. 17,
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet.
5-13-15-2002-010526).
The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the
misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995,
that there were photographs of the isolated HI-virus inside the
publications of Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the
untruthfulness of this statement using Dr. Marcus' statement itself. The
court imposed a suspended sentence of 8 months of jail because of
attempted coercion of the authorities to adhere and act according to law
and order.
Originally posted by squiz
Barré-Sinoussi and Montagnier discovered HIV in the lymph nodes of recently infected patients. It was being produced in large quantities in white blood cells and it induced the death of cells of a kind that was missing in patients suffering from AIDS. HIV was like a chameleon. Each patient carried a unique virus variant, which could hide in the host cell genome. Barré-Sinoussi and Montagnier's discovery explained the progression of the disease and its communicability, enabling them to establish the connection between HIV and AIDS.
Sorry must have missed the part where he isolated it. Says it's like a chameleon, a unique variant carried by everyone, hiding in host cells.
Doesn't sound to isolated to me?
Of course you'd never see it in the U.S. the propaganda machine is too great.
German Court Rules "HIV never Isolated"
Originally posted by squiz
So no isolation then?
You like to attack everything but the actual subject matter don't you?
What about the court case? was it fake?
How about this question then, has HIV ever been isolated, purified and cultured? The gold standard? These are the conditions met for virology.
Has it been done? I can't find it.