It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So let me get this straight: The Pentagon has video tapes of the Boeing hitting their own building..

page: 7
61
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
Uh, how about that one that shows the plane crashing into the building that has been all over the internet and on the news for years?


Hmmm... all I saw was a trail of white smoke, and a few frames of explosion.

If you could circle the actual plane crashing into the building, that would be ace. I'm sure there's a lot of people on ATS who would really appreciate that...

Rew




posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 07:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rewey

Originally posted by hooper
Uh, how about that one that shows the plane crashing into the building that has been all over the internet and on the news for years?


Hmmm... all I saw was a trail of white smoke, and a few frames of explosion.

If you could circle the actual plane crashing into the building, that would be ace. I'm sure there's a lot of people on ATS who would really appreciate that...

Rew

Hi Rewy,
You are right in saying that there are no pics of the 'plane actually hitting the Pentagon, but of the two cameras at the control point the one nearer to the impact does briefly show the nose of an aircraft. Going by that you would have to say that it was an aircraft. The second camera does not seem to have picked it up however, all you see is the white smoke, (i'm presuming it is from a damaged engine) but if that is the case, where did the damage come from, the lightpoles or hitting the ground or both or being overstressed, it's open forum there.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 08:10 PM
link   
I cant believe people are debating on whether or not more tapes exist! Of course there are more tapes, just assuming that the Pentagon didn't have any other recording(ridiculous), the FBI confiscated every civilian security tape that 'might have something on it. I totally agree with the OP, just give us the tapes, why not? Do people really think that showing the tape will somehow weaken our country more than the f'ed up feeling it gives people who are critical thinkers; feeling that we are nothing more than spectators in other peoples messed up show?



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 09:07 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


How much do they pay??? Or do you do this for free?

2nd line



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 09:19 PM
link   
There ARE no tapes of a Boeing hitting the Pentagon! Are you kidding me? (And by "you", I mean the government.) They may have tapes of a missle hitting the Pentagon, but no genuine tapes of an aircraft.

Why do you think they won't show them?

People tend to believe what they are told, not what they SEE! Why is that??

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 5-11-2009 by UnityFT]



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 11:39 PM
link   
Of Course there are videos.. lol...


they just show the truth ...


so..


we will never see them...

ever..




posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 11:45 PM
link   
A passenger jet did fly into the Pentagon. Before we even knew what had gone down in NYC my friends sister called from her job across 395 at Pentagon City and told us she had watched a jet fly into the pentagon. It happened people. Somethings are as they seem, not everything is an evil government conspiracy. If there's any conspiracy at all about 9/11, its probably related to Flight 93 and whether the passengers are heroes for taking the plane down themselves, or were took down before they took others on the ground with them to the afterlife.



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 11:50 PM
link   
In regards to the debate of whether a plane or missile hit the pentagon:


I'm curious what the opinions are of Allyn Kilsheimer who is mentioned in popular mechanics' debunking the 9/11 myths: a special report. Does anyone know of how reliable he is and if his account has been discussed before?

from the popularmechanics.com


Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"


A quick google search didn't come up with much about Allyn Kilsheimer as far as trying to discredit him but pilotsfor911truth.org says that two other black boxes had been found by two firefighters reportedly, so there shouldn't have been a third box which he said to have found.




[edit on 5-11-2009 by Jedimind]

[edit on 6-11-2009 by Jedimind]



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 02:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
 


I'm sure they have tapes. I can recall afew months after the hit on the towers, There was a story of video footage taken by a man at a gas station. I think it had something to do with the angle the footage was taken because not long after the attacks a Governemnt agency confiscated the tape. I looked up the news article again but was unable to locate it.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 03:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Jedimind
 


Popular Mechanics was a straw mans attempt to convince the masses that the 'conspiracy theorists' are crazy. It is a Hearst owned publication with a controversial background. You will have to look into it yourself but let's just say there was some strange firings and hirings.....

The guy Kilsheimer says he held body parts and crew uniforms that miraculously survived the fireball that apparently vaporized 100 tonnes of steel and titanium alloy. There was no giant tail stabiliser, no engine, no seats, no wing sections, no fuselage.

Government forensics teams claim to have identified 180+ bodies. This is just on 'paper'. No witnesses saw any bodies. There was some rather clean looking plane like parts that were taken away by men in black from the still immaculate lawn. Soooooo many things don't add up.

Here is a clip of the former Major General of Intelligence giving his 2 cents.



There is still the ultimate kick in the nuts...... where is the 757



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 05:02 AM
link   
reply to post by vehemes terra eternus
 





fireball that apparently vaporized 100 tonnes of steel and titanium alloy. There was no giant tail stabiliser, no engine, no seats, no wing sections, no fuselage.


And if you honestly believe your statement then that would explain your disconnect from the reality of that day. The plane didnt vaporize, sure some of it did melt. However, the rest of it became pieces of what used to be a fuselage, wings, engines etc....

I also could point you to the words of rescue specialists who found what was left of Flight 77 passengers, still strapped into what was left of their airline seats.....but, pretty sure it wouldnt do any good.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 05:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
 


Since most everyday people accept that a plane hit the pentagon (only those on conspiracy websites think differently) there's no need to release footage of it.

And seeing as how close the cameras would've been to capture it happening, I'd imagine it would be extremely grisly and quite horrific to see.

Do you really want to watch people die a horrible death just to quench your belief in a cover up?



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 05:38 AM
link   
reply to post by thesneakiod
 


Excuse me?

Remove your avatar you shallow hypocrite. I'm tired of people saying such disgusting crap. Why would anyone "want" to see people die?



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 06:42 AM
link   
reply to post by thesneakiod
 


you must be a stand up comic. If you are not, then consider changing carrers.


You are a funny guy.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 07:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by SyphonX
reply to post by thesneakiod
 


Excuse me?

Remove your avatar you shallow hypocrite. I'm tired of people saying such disgusting crap. Why would anyone "want" to see people die?




Jesus can you even read properly? I never said I wanted to see people to die. All I said it would be horrific to watch, and that the OP wants to see it purely for conspirital reasons.

My avatar is irrelevant, its an iconic picture, and it certainly doesn't mean I like watching people die.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 07:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by thesneakiod
 


you must be a stand up comic. If you are not, then consider changing carrers.


You are a funny guy.



If your going to post a sarcastic reply, then at least do it in a way that I can know what the hell you are talking about.

Or failing that, at least be funny.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 08:40 AM
link   


9-11 commissioner
"One of our fortresses pried open by a missle *OOPS!* Plane.


Deny ignorance is the motto here.

6 of the 10 9-11 commissioners say it was a coverup.


EVEN THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THE OFFICIAL STORY NOW SAY ITS FAKE.
Yet you continue to believe their lies.

Go on and think your special and the country is good and that nothing bad ever happens. I'll be laughing when the revolution starts full force and you start crying when your TV won't pickup American Idol. *edit to add in* and that goes to ANYONE who doesn't believe 9-11 was nothing short of a COMPLETE and UTTER inside job.



[edit on 6-11-2009 by The_Zomar]



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 08:44 AM
link   
I would have thought that if it was an inside job then the safest thing to do to prevent any video footage ever being released would be to disable all the Pentagon's CCTV cameras around that time and then all they'd have to worry about is confiscating the recordings from nearby buildings.

I don't think we'll ever see any real footage because there isn't any left.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 08:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mark_Amy
I would have thought that if it was an inside job then the safest thing to do to prevent any video footage ever being released would be to disable all the Pentagon's CCTV cameras around that time


Oh you mean like they did on the world trade center when all the security cams "malfunctioned" and all security doors to the building were set to public access.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   
From some friends I know personally who work at the Pentagon they all agree that "an airplane" did not strike the building. They have also made statements on this in the past and were told in no uncertain terms "to can it" but there are many people who were there or in the area that day that have said the same thing. One does not have to be a rocket scientist to look at the impact area to see that it was not an aircraft but some type of ordinance. There is simply no way that an airliner went through all of that reinforced concrete & steel to have popped out of the other side. Aircraft debris at the scene do not even match the color scheme of an AA plane. And not too mention that the "aircraft" left no debris of any discernible size or damage to the ground leaves one to ask more questions than not. In addition, I know two private pilots who are retired from Pan Am and they both say that in order to fly an aircraft the size of the one that supposedly flew into the Pentagon at such a leveled out course would have required the skills of someone who has flown for many years as it is nearly impossible to keep the aircraft (of that size) steady during high speed/low altitude flight that close to the ground. No, it does not add up at all!

[edit on 6-11-2009 by mikelee]



new topics

top topics



 
61
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join