It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Again, I asked you to provide credible evidence to support your belief in the OS. The fact is the OS is the only story that is completely unbelievable and lacks any real evidence. Try again.
You have failed to provide any evidences to prove the OS true.
Then, once again, you fail to do the simple research. It is not hard to find dozens of links on ATS to various official websites that show the evidence.
Why do you believe in the OS, and what credible scientific evidence convinced you that the OS is absolutely true?
This is an easy one. Its the only "story" that fits the actual evidence.
United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To ATC/Radar
United 93 transponder is recognized by Air Traffic Control as airborne after alleged impact time. Some have made the excuse this is due to Coast Mode tracking. ATC did not recognize any signs of CST (Coast Mode). Further confirmation that this was not any type of "Coast Mode" is that ATC also recognized United 93 reporting an altitude. The only way ATC could observe a reported altitude is if United 93 were squawking Mode C on the transponder, which means altitude reporting capability. Further confirmation comes in the form of latitude and longitude positions reported by ATC. N39 51 - W78 46 were reported as the last known radar position of United 93. It is unclear if the position is reported as Degrees, Minutes or Decimal, however, standard aviation terminology is in Degrees, Minutes. With that said, both positions are well past the alleged United 93 Crash site.
Originally posted by impressme
pilotsfor911truth.org...
So, that is why the FBI refuses to give serial numbers out to investigator because they will find out they belong to bone-yard scraps and not to United or American Airlines.
Why do you believe in the OS, and what credible scientific evidence has convinced you that the OS is absolutely true? Please show your “sources”.
Please. Do your own already on-life-support credibility a favor by not referencing the PfT club.
They have been proven time and time again to be the most non-credible source on a large number of fronts regarding these issues.
If you want to be taken seriously in these discussions, please tell us what the reason is why the FBI is not giving you aircraft serial number parts.
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by one4all
Does anyone know the technical side of marking a building for a laser guided munition or drone?Would the laser be visible somehow prior to impact?
Dude, several other posters have already asked you a good question:
Why would you need a laser guided system to hit a building that freakin' big!!
I think this well help answer the question.
Rare footage shows laser guidance system directing flight 175 into the south tower!
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by impressme
[I think this well help answer the question.
Rare footage shows laser guidance system directing flight 175 into the south tower!
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Yeah, I saw that.
Nice shot of the sun making a reflection off the glass.
That is your opinion, where is your proof that it’s a reflection ?
Remember, I ask you first, so stop deflecting and avoiding.
Did you actually read my post???
Read the last bit again. The one that says that military lasers are invisible.
Now go out and do some PT.
Did you not READ my post? Stop deflecting and avoiding.
How can something invisible cause a reflection???
And I have a question: Do you always say "stop deflecting and avoiding" when something doesn't fit your theory?
Yeah, I'm still waiting for impressme to tell me how an invisible laser can make a reflection in a buildings window. Avoid and deflect. Avoid and deflect.
But other than that, you guys can keep rockin' on with your bad selves.
Yeah, I saw that.
Nice shot of the sun making a reflection off the glass.
That is your opinion, where is your proof that it’s a reflection ?
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by one4all
Does anyone know the technical side of marking a building for a laser guided munition or drone?Would the laser be visible somehow prior to impact?
Does anyone know
Prove it was a reflection? OK, that ATS thread is from someone that thinks he saw a laser designator reflection in a window. I told you that a military laser designator is invisible, and how can something invisible make a reflection at all?
It looks like it probably was a sun reflection. Prove it? Well, it was sunny on 9/11. Just look at any videos taken that day, or maybe get really ambitious and dig up the old weather reports. Sun was shining; there's your proof.
Think it was the USAF that was part of 9/11? They are just now deciding whether we wear our PT tshirts tucked in or outside of our PT shorts. We've had these uniforms since 2005.
Originally posted by impressme
*probably was a sun reflection*
That does not prove anything and that was your opinion.
Originally posted by impressme
What does the USAF uniforms have to do with this topic?
But back on track, quiet avoiding and deflecting: What's your theory or opinion that the reflection was?
Swampfox, I am asking only YOU and no one else. Stop deflecting the question. What was the undisputed scientific evidence that has convince you one hundred present that the OS is one hundred percent true?
A Army rescue specialist reporting he finds whats left of human beings strapped into whats left of airline seats isnt "scientific".
Work on your vocabulary.