United Nations Launches Investigation of Human Rights Abuses in the United States, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times
Topic started on 26-10-2009 @ 08:01 PM by ElectricUniverse
For those of you who have never even heard of a “Special Rapporteur,” you may be surprised to find out that one has been appointed by the United Nations (UN), under a special mandate from the UN Human Rights Council (the successor to the corrupt and anti-Israel UN Commission on Human Rights), to open a probe—for the first time ever— into human rights violations by the United States because of a perception that there isn’t enough affordable public housing in urban areas.

Democracy Now!’s Amy Goodman reports that Raquel Rolnik, a Brazilian urban planner and the UN’s choice for the task, will be investigating issues of concern to the UN vis-à-vis the United States, including public housing, homelessness and foreclosures. As part of her fact-finding mission, she will visit New York City, Chicago, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Washington, a South Dakota Indian reservation, and Wilkes-Barre, Pa. She will then compile a report on her findings, which will be submitted to the UN General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council in March.

The UN Human Rights Council believes that housing is a human right, and, because housing (especially “affordable housing”) is so tough to come by in places like New York City, there is a strong likelihood that the United States Government is guilty of gross human rights violations.
...........
UN Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing Raquel Rolnik: If we take housing as a human right, you have to go back to the idea that housing is a social issue before and more priority than housing as a commodity, as a financial asset.

newsrealblog.com...


Wow, I guess I was right. Housing is a "RIGHT" according to the UN, and they are going to use this as an excuse to come to the U.S. and check out York City, Chicago, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Washington, a South Dakota Indian reservation, and Wilkes-Barre, Pa.

According to the claims of the UN “Special Rapporteur,” who happens to be from no other place than Brazil, the United States is in gross violations of Human Rights because there is not enough affordable housing.

ALL the members that will be responding most probably have a house, or live in an apartment, and I am certain there will be at least some members who will approve this move by the UN, and will start pointing at some of the problems in the U.S. concerning affordable housing.

But the fact is that the UN doesn't give a rat's behind about the problem of "affordable housing" ANYWHERE...

This UN “Special Rapporteur” comes from Brazil, a country that has worse affordable housing conditions than the U.S. has. Not to mention that there are several dozen other countries around the world that have a worse problem with "affordable housing" than the U.S. has, yet the UN hasn't sent any “Special Rapporteur" to most of these places. So why send one to the U.S.?... and more so, why is it that the President, and his entire administration agreed to this, since this “Special Rapporteur” must be invited by the government of the nation being "inspected".

To me this is just another excuse to allow for the UN to have more control over the U.S., and the Obama administration, and President Obama himself have already agreed to this takeover by the UN.

The UN “Special Rapporteur” has ALREADY made up her mind that the U.S. is in gross violation of "Human Rights" since The UN Human Rights Council believes that housing is a human right.

Make no mistake, this is only an excuse to allow the UN to set up rules, and laws by which we will have to abide, and the Obama administration is not only allowing this to happen, but they are happy that this is happening.

Many, if not most of the people who are part of the Obama administration, including it's Czars are advocates of giving our sovereignty to the UN, and for the UN to control us.

I just can't believe that no one in Congress, or even the House of Representatives, or any other Congressman, or Congresswoman seem to have raised an alarm over this. At least i haven't heard, or read anyone doing so, but I could be wrong.

This is a gross violation of the sovereignty of the United States, and the Obama administration is in with this take over of the U.S. by the UN.

[edited for errors]

[edit on 26-10-2009 by ElectricUniverse]


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 08:47 PM by starwarsisreal




reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 11:40 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by ElectricUniverse



What they're likely to find out is that most {not all} but most homeless are in serious need of therapy or medication. The state mental hospitals are known to dump people on the streets when their ability to pay falls out.

The states can't afford to pay for their needs becuase they are too financially strapped paying to keep the seriously violent offenders behind bars.

The rest are either Alcoholics/drug addicts or simply people who have had an honest run of bad luck.



[edit on 26-10-2009 by SLAYER69]



reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 11:52 PM by ldyserenity
reply to post by ElectricUniverse



Instead of bashing the president and the UN How about you tell us what you proport to do to clean up this catastrophe and human rights mess that is very real? How about coming up with solutions instead of knocking everybody else's down? Oh but I'm sure you have a nice cushy residence and lots of money burning your pockets, so what do you care, as long as you're happy. Right? That's the problem with you people, all full of complaints but not an ounce of any type of thoughts or ideas to change an unfair system in the least. I get so sick of threads like this, go crawl back into bed.


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 12:06 AM by Bored To Tears
reply to post by ldyserenity



I have a nice cushy small apartment supplied by the United States Army, no money burning a hole in my pocket, I work 2 jobs to make sure my week old baby girl and wife have everything they need.

I believe most that are homeles because, even though they are abled bodied, they don't want to work.

Here is my solution.

Instead of feeding these people, no questions asked, they should get one meal in the morning. They should not be allowed lunch, dinner or allowed into homeless shelters unless they can prove they are actively seeking employment.

That should drastically cut down the amount of homeless in a few years. Those who are not employable due to mental illness will then be better taken care of due to the fact more money, food and shelter will be available.

Will this completely solve the situation? No, there are those who will just find another way to not work.

But it will improve the situation drastically.

I don't see how the system is unfair. The system isn't telling these people they can't work, pay rent, by food.


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 12:53 AM by Detailed Perfection
I've been surfing ATS too much because the first thing that came to mind:

"After my investigation, it is my duty to advise that the "Emergency FEMA Camps" that are spread out through the US should be used to house the homeless. Also, on many occasions I found that families were cramming themselves into tiny, inhabital housing that meets the criteria of condemnation. For these people to be forced into such extremely unhealthy living arrangements, I am also advising that the multi-family homes be condemned and the families that will be put out on the streets, for their own safety, also be wrangled up and admitted into the FEMA Camps."

I know I know ... It's a buncha BS. I personally think the whole FEMA Camp situation has been blown way out of proportion, but for some reason that was the first thing that came to mind. Now that I've actually typed it out and read through it, it does make ya think though.
- Unemployed, can't afford to support family: FEMA Camp.
- Retired and living on SSI: FEMA Camp
- Living off of Welfare w/ no job: FEMA Camp
- etc.

I mean afterall, if there is no affordable housing to meet your human rights .. Maybe the Government should step in and provide that housing for you through their new found "Society Gathered Communities".

OKAY .. sorry to go on .. I don't honestly believe any of that. Sorry.

My question, which will never be given an honest official answer, is how come the U.S.?

Shouldn't the government of Mexico be investigated for their inability to protect their citizens human rights from war mongering murdering Drug Cartels? There are many more reasons to investigate Mexico, but that is the most important to me.

Or how about any of the Third World countries that don't even have housing for the most part?

I'm not trying to imply that the US is a Utopian Nirvana in any way what-so-ever. I know we have problems like other countries. Hell, we have problems that other countries don't have.

I agree with some of you. There has to be other reasons behind this situation than what has been stated. The quesion is, what?

Oh .. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't the crime of treason against the United States punishable by death? Hell, Thomas Jefferson deemed himself sole executioner after an American was convicted of treason. The poor bastard took a fatal shot and lay dying on the White House lawn for almost 10 hours before be finally died.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 108 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 89 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 12 hours ago, 48 replies