Swine Flu Roll Call, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 01:53 PM by loam
reply to post by DevolutionEvolvd





Seriously, has anyone claiming to be infected by swine flu actually been TESTED for swine flu? I'd be curious about the answers...


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:15 PM by asala
reply to post by loam



yep i was, i was tested due to being a carer for my grandmother who is generally of very ill heath, she has no spleen ect so it was important for it to be known if mine was just normal flu or not,

They are not testing in my area due to the amount of possibiltys due to the rising number but in certain cases they will test like mine,

Though my grandmother seems to be fine and not have anything rather than a small cold,



[edit on 6-11-2009 by asala]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:24 PM by marg6043
reply to post by asala



I am glad that you have a good Doctor that knows the dangers and is keeping track of your recovery, one of the main problems about the swine flu is the way Doctors ignore the underlying side effects.

Most people that develop Pneumonia that otherwise are healthy is due to thinking that because they feel better everything is fine, but I know chest congestion is troublesome enough to be ignored.

Take care.



[edit on 6-11-2009 by marg6043]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:26 PM by marg6043
reply to post by fraterormus



Interesting that overall swine flu cases happen to be just as the seasonal flu when not underlying health problems affect the infected person, or when the infected person otherwise healthy takes care of their symptoms.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:38 PM by Donkey_Dean
reply to post by xtradimensions



Yes it is very very nasty. I suspect those who say it’s so mild are either misdiagnosed or lying! It’s the flu, and I am sure those who play down the severity of H1N1 will have their turn in the sun!

[edit on 6-11-2009 by Donkey_Dean]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:43 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Donkey_Dean



It will be silly to downplay the flu overall, because flu does kill every year regardless.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:48 PM by fraterormus
Originally posted by Donkey_Dean
Yes it is very very nasty. I suspect those who say it’s so mild are either misdiagnosed or lying! It’s the flu, and I am sure those who play down the severity of H1N1 will have their turn in the sun!


Well, although with any disease Y.M.M.V. There will always be those who suffer more severely than others just as there are those that will suffer far less severe symptoms than others...and some that show a natural immunity. That is the case with all diseases.

However, I do believe that there is a major amount of misdiagnosis going on as well. The Health Care Industry is so quick to chalk every Flu-like symptom up as a "confirmation" of H1N1, and as the only reliable test costs over $400 and over a week to get the results, they either err on the side of caution, or use the inexpensive Nasal Swab Test which is more incorrect than it is accurate.

If this later case is true, that there is a lot of misdiagnosis going on in regards to H1N1, and simple Type A or Type B Influenza cases are being attributed to H1N1, then the numbers of those infected would be over-inflated by roughly 58% making it not as a widespread pandemic as it is feared to be. Although, the flip-side of this would also mean that those who really have H1N1 instead of those misdiagnosed with it, are facing far more severe symptoms than those who don't really have it but are yet further statistics of having been infected when they really haven't.

All in all, I highly doubt it comes down to anyone lying, at least as far as those who have been told they are infected with it by their doctors.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 03:04 PM by marg6043
reply to post by fraterormus



This a good read,

How Many Cases are Really Swine Flu?

CBS, to their credit, conducted a three-month long investigation that indicates that we have all been hoodwinked by the governmental “protection” agency called euphemistically, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.34

What they tried to learn from the CDC was just what percentage of the “flu cases” were in fact H1N1. The CDC did all they could to protect this information and only after filing a Freedom of Information request and waiting 2 months did they finally release the data. Now we know why they wanted it protected and why they stopped testing for the H1N1 virus in late July.

The data revealed that in fact very few cases reported as swine flu were in fact H1N1 variant virus. CBS examined the data in all 50 states. What they found, for example, was that in Georgia only 2% of reported cases were H1N1 (97% negative for H1N1); in Alaska only 1% of reported cases were H1N1 (93% negative for flu and 5% seasonal flu) and in California only 2% of reported cases were H1N1 with 12% being other flu viruses and 86% negative for flu.

A recent release from the CDC found that their survey reported that of 12,943 specimens tested from around the country, only 26.3% of cases tested positive for H1N1 variant virus, but that 99.8% of the specimens tested positive for some type of other flu virus, most of which were regular seasonal flu.

The CDC has now changed all data reporting on the flu effects. They did this by stopping viral typing and subtyping and rolled back all previous numbers based on prior data. The new system for collecting data now started on August 30th, 2009.

The only reason I can imagine they did this is that the prior data was clearly demonstrating that the H1N1 variant virus was causing a very mild illness in most people (99.99%) with fewer hospitalizations, fewer cases of pneumonia and fewer deaths for all ages and groups than the prior seasonal flu in past years. This was true for the United States and the Southern Hemisphere, which has gone though the worst of its flu season.

Now that they are no longer typing the virus, they can attribute all cases of pneumonia, hospitalizations and deaths to H1N1, even though the majority of cases appear to be from a long list of other causes. In fact, they can classify many cases of primary pneumonia as caused by H1N1.
ex]

articles.mercola.com...



reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:25 PM by marg6043
reply to post by asala



I believe if I am not mistaken is due to the people been in hospitals more susceptible to contracting what is call hospital pneumonia.

I read something in Dr. Mercola site about statistics shows that this has been happening more often with or without flu as viruses and bacteria become stronger, so actually hospitals has become breeding ground for all kind of nasty stuff.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:42 PM by Aeons
Originally posted by Donkey_Dean
reply to
post by xtradimensions



Yes it is very very nasty. I suspect those who say it’s so mild are either misdiagnosed or lying! It’s the flu, and I am sure those who play down the severity of H1N1 will have their turn in the sun!

[edit on 6-11-2009 by Donkey_Dean]


There are just some people who don't get as sick. And some strains that seem less nasty than others.

My children had the oddball symptoms, and they and my husband have been exposed repeatedly to people who have been confirmed with more severe H1N1.

Biological individuality. Plus we don't know if other factors can change the course of the disease. For example, we just had a cold go through our family a couple of weeks ago. Perhaps this changes the course of the disease. Could the norovirus that we contracted last year be a factor? Is the fact that the members of my family that were suspectible to swine flus already "culled" previously? Because on the one side there was 1918 deaths, and on the other side we know that they were around it but there is no record of any problems in any person in that line due to it.

I am not lying. I find this virus to be quite concerning, and have since last May.

My guess is that we have some sort of resistance already to it. Perhaps genetic.

I also suspect that my family is resistant to lice. Totally unrelated We also tend to regrow things other people don't. I just wish it was TEETH.

[edit on 2009/11/6 by Aeons]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 11 days ago with 20 member flags
Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
Deadly new superbug heading for Britain!
  Posted 1 days ago with 8 member flags
NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Found in 37 U.S. States
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 29 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags