It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why not review the material yourself and come to your own conclusions?
I hadn't realized that your model involved any non-intersecting dimensions at all.
a continuously increasing model would necessitate more non-intersecting dimensions
You appear to be attempting to conceptualize each individual dimension as a discreet, three dimensional block.....
If true...then your dimensions do intersect. Right? If so...how does your model make any sense?
"Dimension" is being used metaphorically.
What is the nature of the change in consciousness you are describing? Please do not use the words "dimension," "density" or any numbers in your answer.
Originally posted by sirnex
The two are inherently different and not translatable across each other in any way.
Originally posted by xelamental
this is not a theory. It's a guess at worst, an hypothesis at best.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Psychonaughty
What do you mean by light vibration? I've never heard of light being in vibration or a vibration in itself. Where did you find this sort of terminology in reference to light? You do know what light is and is not, right?
my point is that if none of the planes intersect,
then they can only run parallel to each other.
will give it some thought and report back
i have collapsed 3D time-space into a single 2D plane, and drawn
the 5th Dimension as a plane perpendicular to the time-space plane.
use of the word "dimension" is every bit as meaningful in the context of psycho-spiritual
development as it is in cosmology and molecular physics. in fact the concepts are directly
linked by an underpinning model of reality.
Originally posted by LordBucket
reply to post by tgidkp
What is the nature of the change in consciousness you are describing? Please do not use the words "dimension," "density" or any numbers in your answer.
"Lengthy post and a bunch of pictures"
i failed miserably at your request to limit my words. i hope you will forgive me. i am weak.
Originally posted by tgidkp
Originally posted by LordBucket
reply to post by LordBucket
According to some schools of thought...
i apologise for my AUTHORITATIVE tone. i fully intend an air of discussion, to clarify as nearly as possible what is meant by "rising into a higher dimension". it is one of those phrases that gets tossed around and i, personally, would like to come to a scientifically comprehensible agreement about what it means. ...get everyone on the same page, so to speak.
the OP is intended only as a jumping off point: MY jumping off point.
please, everyone, feel free to insert your own jumping off points.
[edit on 16-10-2009 by tgidkp]
you have correctly identified this as AN IDEA. congratulations.
you would be mistaken if you propose that i am speaking on topics that i do not have a full grasp of.
granted, there are details to be worked out. but the model is, in fact, predictive in a variety of ways.
for example: you can infer that the density of matter has an inverse relationship to time.
time increases, density decreases, also known as radioactive decay. this is not a new idea in itself. what IS new about it is that the density function is plotted as an intersecting plane across time-space. in other words, time - space - density can now be correlated in a meaningful way. this can give us an idea of the shape of the universe, among other things.....
....it also, admittedly, could be waaay off the mark.
Originally posted by xelamental
So, can you make some concrete predictions? Why do certain atoms decay at different rates? What are the implications of this prediction in your view?
....Please, go into excruciating detail.
...fifteen-hundred thousand different dimensions, we'd be equally existing in every single one of them.