NASA "Moon Bombing" mission -- DISAPPEARS, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 70 times


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:18 PM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by gortex
reply to
post by Soylent Green Is People



you say there is evidence that it did hit , can you post that evidence for us to see please , or are you saying that there is evidence because NASA say there is.


I'm saying there is evidence because NASA says there is -- and has shown some of the data and IR images.

I suppose I believe them for the same reason I believe that the Moon has water in the first place -- because NASA said it did back in 1994. I guess if I want to doubt everything NASA says, then perhaps I should doubt the possible existence of this water ice to begin with.

Heck, for that matter, perhaps I should doubt the existence of water on Mars. Perhaps Mars is just as dry as much of the Moon, and NASA has only lied to us about the existence of water there.

Perhaps Titan doesn't have liquid methane lakes. Maybe NASA lied to us about that, too, and Titan is a big boring rock. Perhaps NASA has lied about Europa's oceans -- or the Enceladus' water-ice geysers.

Perhaps Venus' atmosphere has no chance of supporting microbes, and the speculation by NASA scientists that life is possible in the clouds of Venus is just ONE BIG NASA LIE.

Gosh -- if I don't trust NASA to tell me some basic science facts about the solar system, then possibly the solar system is a much more boring place than NASA lets on.

...By the way, am I to believe that the impact didn't occur only because you personally could not see it?


[edit on 10/9/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:38 PM by gortex
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



By the same logic the Solar system could be a far more exotic place and NASA is keeping it quite .
I Didnt see it , Nobody but Nasa saw it apparently .


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:41 PM by Tifozi
reply to post by gortex



The Solar System isn't the size of the representation that you have in a classroom.

For example, just a few days ago it was discovered by chance a huge wring around Saturn, that can only be seen with IR.

Source:

edition.cnn.com...

There are things that are "just there" that we haven't seen yet. Which, in my opinion, rulles out any theory that we are alone in the Universe, or that we know "a lot" about it.


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:45 PM by fieryjaguarpaw
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People




Seriously that made me laugh

Now you are just splitting hairs. Whatever. If you guys want to think that NASA can do no wrong and that a mission never goes wrong then more power to ya. I think the history speaks for itself though. NASA has a problem with almost every thing it ever does. Just a few days ago we got new pictures of Mercury and just at the moment it was to get the money shot it had a technical "hic-up". Problems are the rule with NASA not the exception. I don't understand why you guys can't fathom the possibility that something may have gone wrong.


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:48 PM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by gortex
reply to
post by Soylent Green Is People



By the same logic the Solar system could be a far more exotic place and NASA is keeping it quite .


You're right -- that is entirely possible.

However, why (for example) would the even bother telling us about Europa's ocean or Enceledus' geysers in the first place? What not just tell us they are big boring rocks, just like they originally thought they were? Who would be the wiser? Why even tell the world they sent space probes there in the first place? If they can lie about the solar system, they can secretly send probes out there.

I Didnt see it , Nobody but Nasa saw it apparently .

The data from the Earth-based telescopes has not been fully analyzed yet. Nobody saw anything in "real time" at the time of impact, but what was seen in "real time" is not necessarily the end-all to the data set that was intended to be used.

In short, I'm saying that the observer can't trust what he saw (since he can't see everything at all wavelengths) -- he can only trust what the data later tells him after it's analyzed.

UPDATE:
Kitt Peak observatory saw the flash of the impact. Analysis of the flash indicates the presence of sodium -- which is consistent with the spectroscopic analysis from the shepherding spacecraft right after the Centaur impact.
www.newscientist.com...

[edit on 10/9/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:57 PM by fieryjaguarpaw
reply to post by PenandSword



Here is something that I think is even closer.



I was suprised to not here them pronounce it this way.


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 12:59 PM by gortex
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



However, why (for example) would the even bother telling us about Europa's ocean or Enceledus' geysers in the first place

Why not , they have to release information to justify there huge budget from public funds , I am not saying they lie about everything , just that they have been and are economical with the truth .


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 01:04 PM by emsed1
Originally posted by genius/idoit
reply to
post by emsed1



read the link


I did.

It's a fictional humor story written by a man who is also a Freemason.

Not weird.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 22 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags