AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aliens and UFOs discussion forum.  (rss)


NASA "Moon Bombing" mission -- DISAPPEARS


<<  36    37    38    39  >>



reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 10:50 AM by Cybernet


There is one thing about the LCROSS mission which i dont know if anyone else noticed...

If you go to this site:
apps.nasa.gov...

It doesn't work...in the sense that you cannot access any data (images), nor any profiles. It says every time "The site is experiencing high request volume, and the image is still in the processing queue. Check back soon!".
That would be perhaps fine, but not when you consider:
a) its a NASA (government) site, they are rarely offline and if then only for a very short time
b) its from their latest mission more less which they wanted everyone to watch and found important
c) the site/files went down the other day after the mission and have the same status ever since
d) if you ask NASA to fix it, they either ignore you or reply "we will look at it", but don't do anything with it at all

And that's just the image database from the mission itself, not counting all the other bizzar aspects of the mission which imho was a diversion or lie and sounded fishy from the start... By the way, I went through all the images before the site went down. What I saw? Many amateur astronomers took nice detailed photos of the impact area. They show buldings/ruins/structures. That's why the site is offline. So that the people won't know what was really behind this mission in the first place, or simply, don't start asking questions.




[edit on 6/11/09 by Cybernet]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-12-2009 @ 09:56 PM by demontigny


reply to post by JimOberg



if you think about it there is no air in space and with no air there is no explosion .. there go no plum or anything like that if they wanted to test it properly they should have tested it in the desert where they tested the nuclear missle an all that .. and if the moon was hollowed out like some of you were saying it would have imploded or floated away from the impact point .. thats my 2 cents



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-12-2009 @ 10:21 PM by Overload


First and foremost...Jim started this thread...does that not raise some eyebrows?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!

I have an inside informant that tells me--after I asked why did the Lacross mission go silent in main stream media?

She replied--
"Why do youthink it went silent"?

I said
"The mission had technical difficulties and was a complete failure or.................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... .............................................

Something else happened"

She said
"The later"

I have been very busy uncovering some of the most darkest secrets of the good old U.S.A and not to my astonishment....am I surprised by it.


THINK ABOUT IT PEOPLE-
WHY DID THE MAIN STREAM COVERAGE DIE IN JUST 56 HOURS OF SUCH A HUGE ASTONISHMENT IN MANKINDS HISTORY?....!!!.....!!!!...!!!!...!!!...!!!...!!!...!!!....!!!



DO YOU HAVE A BRAIN?............MAYBE..........BUT ITS JUST CONTROLLED LIKE ALL THE REST



   copyright & usage 


<<  36    37    38    39  >>













































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.008 seconds
Page processed in 0.077 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]