It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JayinAR
My point to Zorgon is that I think it is a bit premature to say NASA needs to go because of the results of THIS mission.
Originally posted by JayinAR
I guess the alternative is just to give up space exploration in the private sector and leave it to the black-budget military agencies.
That is NOT something I am interested in seeing.
Originally posted by broli
So with the current tech we would have HD videos from multiple angles out by now no? Or is NASA still deceiving the public with 30 year old tech.
Originally posted by zorgon
Another bungled job... time to replace the whole Agency and get some people that have a clue rather than just wasting money
Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by fieryjaguarpaw
"no water means no moon base?"
I don't think that NASA's future should hinge on whether or not there is water on the moon, but that's just me.
Also, I think everyone here knows there is water on the moon. I think they are just trying to verify how much is there.
Like I said, I expect we'll hear shortly. Within a day or two.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
I agree!! It doesnt hinge on that. It would suck to plan on bringing and establishing your own water generation system if there happens to already be some form of water on the moon which can help in that regard.
Originally posted by zorgonI say we sub contract the job to Russia
Originally posted by MissMegs
Total let down!
OT - www.topgear.com...
Even Top Gear can blow things up better!
Originally posted by zorgon
NASA = Need Another Space Agency
[edit on 9-10-2009 by zorgon]