It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by morethanmeetstheye
I bought an acre of the moon off ebay, can I be sure that wasnt the area that was bombed?
I have a certificate and everything.
Originally posted by BaronVonGodzilla
reply to post by Hal9000
I refuse to believe with all the billions of dollars they have gotten over the last 40 years, they can't take a better picture than that.
They can photograph the cosmos in the deepest space. Hubble Deep Field showed places so far away, nobody in their wildest dreams would ever imagine getting there.
Yet all they can show me from the moon RIGHT NEXT TO US, the moon that EFFECTS OUR TIDES, are tiny white dots?
I just don't believe it. I am sure that they have satellites which could take excellent photos, and until I see those, I won't believe NASA.
Perhaps that makes me ignorant, but I feel they are using 40 year old camera technology when they should be ahead of us. It's bull, and there is a reason for it.
Originally posted by Matyas
Well now, that explains everything. The white out, the coincidence ~28 other satellites could not get a decent picture, the way off base prediction by our learned NASA scientists...
Originally posted by Hal9000
reply to post by Copernicus
No, it's not much to look at and to an audience that is used to seeing spectacular explosions on TV everyday it will be a disappointment.
NASA said they were able to get some data, but I wonder if the plume was big enough to get a sample.