That thing has arms , legs AND wings? sry im not buying it. Maybe it was a congenital deformity.

[edit on 27-9-2009 by VitalOverdose]

evolutionist's are notorious for lying and committing fraud to substantiate the "fact" of evolution.

Yes... this is something solely complicit of evolutionist scientist, and never Creationist scientists.


Nice fine Silo13.

Originnally by Vital Overdose
That thing has arms , legs AND wings? sry im not buying it. Maybe it was a congenital deformity.

No, it had arms with feathers. Not arms and wings.

Could be 1 deformed bird or 2 birds and 1 got eaten.

Theres no other mammal in the world with 3 sets of limbs so i doubt very much if this is what it looks like. Could even be a fake.

Originally posted by VitalOverdose
Could be 1 deformed bird or 2 birds and 1 got eaten.

Theres no other mammal in the world with 3 sets of limbs so i doubt very much if this is what it looks like. Could even be a fake.

Mammal? I didn't think birds where mammals, but eh I've been wrong before.

lol..you could be right. Birds and mammals then. Not to sure about reptiles though but i cant think of any off hand.

[edit on 27-9-2009 by VitalOverdose]

Originally posted by RuneSpider
Yes... this is something solely complicit of evolutionist scientist, and never Creationist scientists.

I wouldn't know, evolutionist's discriminate against Christians and claim it is an oxymoron to be a creationist scientist. I wish they would make up their mind. I DO know Haekel wasn't a creationist, and that the most famous faux fossils passed off as transitional species between man and a "common ancestor" ( they never give the name of it) were submitted as such by evolutionist's. These guys are SO good, So professional and so full of themselves and there superior logic, they were able to construct an entire skeleton broad and thick brow of its skull, the mandible protrududing forward. It was quite the leap of faith or speculation.

It sure as hell wasn't science though. Not when they can do this around the tooth of an extinct PIG. I could literally name hundreds of them. In fact one british museum was known to have over 400 fake fossils being displayed before they finally decided it was messing up science misleading people like that. Gee YA THINK!

What is so ironic is that they all treated skeptics with as much arrogance as I see being displayed here. and invariably they get proven wrong and shrug it off saying, well see science was correcting itself.

Correcting itself? It was an EXTINCT PIG!

Correcting itself? It took 45 years to get them to finally admit piltdown was a prank.

You ever read the emails that were sent among the scientists at the smithsonian and the NAS during hearings to investigate this area of the sciences by the United States Senate?

You couldn't find a better example of discrimination, conspiracy to commit fraud and immaturity among so called professional adult scientist's if they were in 7th grade seeking to be Darwins answer to the KKK.

Originally posted by VitalOverdose

Your probably right but this is the artists sketch of what the scientists are trying to claim this creature looked like.

They always look like that, but check out the fossil. If this thing had feathers, then that tells me it was a bird. They will argue a serated edge on a beak are actually "Fangs" like canines gums and all that. Which would require what? Saliva Glands, which would mean more weight and heavier skull, and a mucus membrane including a sinus cavity which then requires the necessary cilia hairs in the nose and throat to move the mucus which requires the action of a respiratory system that inhales and exhales which is too inefficient to sustain the oxygen levels a bird would has. Their are so many problems with this idea baffles the mind how something like this could have been a reptile, do they know what reptile it was or used to be or what its common ancestor was?