I wouldn't go calling this thing any big deal as I give it a 99% chance it is also a fraud. China is notorious for fossil fraud but this find comes
out of the very worst place to accept any "new Find" for bird fossils.
It is something this science is so inept or unethical it has become a multi million dollar industry and throughout its checkerd past, evolutionist's
are notorious for lying and committing fraud to substantiate the "fact" of evolution. They never seem to take back what they taught in the schools
and we got kids talking smack thinking the are real smart about this stuff and what they never realize is, when it comes to evolution, NOTHING you
learn in school is correct anymore and the most pathetic place on earth to say you aquired some new fangled dino bird fossil is none other than,
Liaoning Province in China.
This one is claimed to be a sensational dinosaur with feathers on its hind legs, thus four ‘wings’.1 This was named Microraptor gui—the
name is derived from words meaning ‘little plunderer of Gu’ after the paleontologist Gu Zhiwei. Like so many of the alleged feathered dinosaurs,
it comes from Liaoning province of northeastern China.
Like every so called missing link so celebrated by the Darwin cult fans that exist on this site, NONE turned out to be what they first thought was the
nail in the coffin for creationists.
Well, as usual, we never heard about the many retractions the NAS and evolutionist's invariably make on the back pages of the many publications and
kids School text books are still using ernst haekels fraudulent embryo images. Like those frauds before it and the thousands that have been caught in
the past, they rarely ever correct this stuff and people actually end up believing these people.
Scientists piece together the 'dino-bird' fossil fraud
By Steve Connor Science Editor
An extinct species of fish-eating bird has been identified by palaeontologists as the other half of a fraudulent fossil that was once hailed as the
"missing link" between dinosaurs and birds.
An extinct species of fish-eating bird has been identified by palaeontologists as the other half of a fraudulent fossil that was once hailed as the
"missing link" between dinosaurs and birds.
Scientists have proved conclusively that the fossil known as Archaeoraptor, which has the tail of a dinosaur and the feathered wings of a bird, was in
fact two or more fossils stuck together with strong glue.
The fossil came to prominence in 1999 when the magazine National Geographic published an account of its discovery and how it had been scientifically
validated as a fossil that many palaeontologists would die for
www.independent.co.uk...
Has this happened a lot?
Let me put it this way, First Darwin stole most of his theory from a creationist, FACT. Second he wasn't the Beagles Naturalist he paid to go on his
trip to the galapogos, and he wasn't a scientist.
The only degree he had was in theology of all things. Every time this theory was about to get axed, it was saved by a HUGE act of fraud, until they
had finally insulated it, making it next to impossible to challenge the theory with out having it damn near ruin your carreer and many were and still
are being "listed" as wrong for evolution.
Today, they speak of it as if their is no question evolution "Happened" but not even Dawkins can explain it without completely contradicting
himself.
Another famous Dino to Bird later it was the evolutionists that ended up having to ingest a lot of another bird for not listening to the science and
listened to their faith in evolution instead.
They ate crow.
In the mid 1800s, when Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution, one species of animal remained a mystery; where did birds fit on his
evolutionary tree? Several years later his friend and colleague, Thomas Henry Huxley, came up with an answer. Huxley had recently examined a new
fossil from southern Germany called Archaeopteryx which was causing considerable excitement in palaeontological circles. There were clear signs of
feathers and it was obvious this was the earliest fossil evidence of a bird ever found. Huxley noticed something else as well. To him it looked as
though the skeleton bore a striking similarity to that of a family of meat eating dinosaurs known as therapods.
www.bbc.co.uk...
This was one of the many acts of fraud PROVEN to keep Darwins theory alive. Another time they were going to dump that silly theory, his buddy earnst
haekel created fraudulent embryo images that are still used today inspite of the, not being anywhere near accurate.
John Scopes Trial, evidence used to prove evoluton true was Piltdown man. In Dover VS Kitzmiller PBS reports them discussing the tiktalaak fossil.
Again not much of a discovery because they have been found alive and well,, look exactly the same as they did many millions of years ago.
As a matter of fact, if you took all the most famous trophy discoveries evolutionists have celebrated as so called transitional fossils, many still
used in posts all through this website where topics apply, have either been diminished in status as nothing but a dead lemur or nothing but a dead
monkey, while many, too many in fact, and ALL the dino to bird examples, have been frauds.
One would think such a theory alleged to be a "fact" wouldn't have to resort to such drastic measures where if the money wasn't an object,
landmark trials could be over turned using fraudulent evidence. This is the single most problematic issue with Darwins theory, is the unusually high
number of frauds and crooks that are in it. Some having 30 years of work and fossil discoveries ALL found to be frauds while the evoltionary tree
those fossils were used in, are still being taught. Ill bet you, this bird find turns out to be a fake. Count on it.
They say creationists would bring science back to the stone age?
As IF!
[edit on 26-9-2009 by Stylez]
