reply to post by Veritas Lux Mea
TLDR? I'm saying what LOAM said =)
I think you're not taking our culture into consideration. For example, look at ancient Rome, homosexuality wasn't looked down upon; any sexuality
was A OK, the goats were terrified though.
I don't think sexuality really has much to do with how masculine you are. Not all gay men act fruity, that's just the face we assign to gay men so
they generally act accordingly.
I'm sure there have been many many many men who we would consider the most masculine of their kind who have had homosexual tendencies.
The argument the OP makes really isn't about sexuality, it's about biological mutations and deformaties (sp?, too tired to care), as well as the
overall attitude of the male gender of species. I would venture, if I read more of this material, the males would be less aggressive, less proficient
hunters, less effective at finding mates, and more passive.
The point is, we have no Beowulf's, no Aeneas', no more Alexanders. Our period will offer few stories of glory and valour, why is this? Could it be
because our global culture has prevented it? It certainly seems so, I don't see why the chemicals we pollute our water and our air with wouldn't
further this process, as sad as it is.
/ramble
[edit on 19-9-2009 by Mr Headshot]