It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
The grays are only a drop in the bucket and although they are invasive, perhaps even hostile, they aren't demonic or fallen angels.
n other words, in order to determine whether or not saying 'Jesus' is effective, you would need to use credible abduction stories, no? I'm curious as to how you are determining which abductions actually happened and which ones didn't.
Originally posted by jritzmann
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
The grays are only a drop in the bucket and although they are invasive, perhaps even hostile, they aren't demonic or fallen angels.
The problem with that, is that in all honesty you have no more proof for your sourcing than the demonic/fallen angel folks do. So, you cannot negate them. You're both in the same boat. The idea is, get the hell into the water and lose the life preserver.
I mean, if your original premise was to write an objective article about this portion of the phenomena, and it's perceived reactions, then it seems your mind is already made up without really doing the diligence of digging in. You're just fighting one ideology with another, which never works unless you're preaching to the right choir.
Make any sense?
[edit on 17-9-2009 by jritzmann]
Originally posted by MAJIC 12
reply to post by jritzmann
If the sample was pure magnesium,It wasn't a meteorite.
Even Iron Meteorites have trace minerals,metals like nickle.
The Roswell crash was in 1947,not `57
Your dismissal of the Roswell witnesses were not named,could you give us
the names of those who are"dropping like flies".
Originally posted by MAJIC 12
Your approach to answering statements you believe are not factually correct or ficticious seems to be similar to the disinformation smear machine of a political party
and their action committees.
Originally posted by MAJIC 12
reply to post by jritzmann
There is a cultural filter it goes through,but it gets clogged with Newsweek explanations
and TIME excuses designed to detour the subject into a Cul DeSac.
You would love "the Gods of Eden" by Bramley
[edit on 17-9-2009 by MAJIC 12]
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
I believe, and want others to believe as well, that while some ETs are possibly hostile, those do not represent ALL ETs and we should not develop prejudices against ETs because of the actions of what is likely a minority of aliens visiting earth.
Originally posted by jritzmann
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
I believe, and want others to believe as well, that while some ETs are possibly hostile, those do not represent ALL ETs and we should not develop prejudices against ETs because of the actions of what is likely a minority of aliens visiting earth.
I forgot to highlight this earlier as I was leaving work...but this statement quoted above:
"I believe, and want others to believe as well"
This is a serious, serious issue. So, I wrote to you about that "same boat" thing...right? This is worse man. This is way worse to have said something like this.
You believe, and want others to believe what you do.
Who's that sound like to you?
I certainly respect that you want to look into this, but immediately there's an agenda that smells like you're ready to put your beliefs out there and that you want to make everyone believe it.
That's not investigation dude. That's religion.
You don't start investigation with wanting everyone to believe what you do. You are the very thing you seem to be arguing against.
Just think about that.
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
"I believe, and want others to believe as well"
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
I do not want to "make" anyone believe what I do.