It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1) Section 1833 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 10
1395l(m)) is amended by redesignating paragraph
(4) as paragraph (5) and by inserting after para-
graph (3) the following new paragraph:
‘‘(4) The provisions of this subsection shall not be
taken into account in applying subsections (m) or (u) and
any payment under such subsections shall not be taken
into account in computing payments under this sub-
section.’’.
Deny the ignorant thought that someone should not be allowed to strike back at someone who is denouncing their plan...
Insurance companies will refuse to have you sign on because of pre-conditions, correct?
Originally posted by Digital_Reality
1) Section 1833 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 10
1395l(m)) is amended by redesignating paragraph
(4) as paragraph (5) and by inserting after para-
graph (3) the following new paragraph:
‘‘(4) The provisions of this subsection shall not be
taken into account in applying subsections (m) or (u) and
any payment under such subsections shall not be taken
into account in computing payments under this sub-
section.’’.
However, that still won't help those that have the major issues that can come up like cancer treatments or organ transplants and so on. Or the emergency treatments from accidents and such that require a massive amount of surgery. Sure, your option works for the everyday situation but not for the high impact unforeseen situations.
Originally posted by Mak Manto
God help whoever thought leaving health care in the hands of corporate moguls was going to be a smart idea...
Originally posted by Mak Manto
The voice of the people matter, but making inflammatory statements is not voicing your opinion...