It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not for everyone and it explicitly states it's not for children.
Like thats gonna keep children away from it.
Dont be naive guys.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Also, why have civil rights or gay rights activists not taken measures against it yet?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by Geladinhu
My actual opinion is that, to a certain extent, acting out violence in imagination is a good thing, allows you to vent. So Im not denying that. But in excess I think it has the opposite effect - desentizing one to violence.
What I am saying is that they are disgusting and the majority of people being "OK" with them, is very telling.
Originally posted by djzombie
Because its an effin video game
Im questioning whether this is healthful stuff and whether a game of soccer might not be preferrable to pissing on cops and beheading bystanders
Writing May 14 in the International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry, Patrick Kierkegaard of the University of Essex, England, suggests that there is scant scientific evidence that video games are anything but harmless and that they do not lead to real world aggression. Moreover, his research shows that previous work is biased towards the opposite conclusion.
However, Kierkegaard explains, there is no obvious link between real-world violence statistics and the advent of video games. If anything, the effect seems to be the exact opposite and one might argue that video game usage has reduced real violence. Despite several high profile incidents in US academic institutions, "Violent crime, particularly among the young, has decreased dramatically since the early 1990s," says Kierkegaard, "while video games have steadily increased in popularity and use. For example, in 2005, there were 1,360,088 violent crimes reported in the USA compared with 1,423,677 the year before. "With millions of sales of violent games, the world should be seeing an epidemic of violence," he says, "Instead, violence has declined."
Oh I see. So taking pleasure in acting like you take crack coc aine, kill people and "hunt faggots" is not at all questionable.
Originally posted by Geladinhu
reply to post by EnlightenUp
Well...How can I get rid of what I don't have?
I don't have anger, I feel anger.
Originally posted by Geladinhu
For instance, I have a lot of repressed anger.
So much anger that I feel like killing.
Its a sensation that can go away with another sensation.
I'm not spuming while playing the game, I'm having a good time, enjoying the opportunity of doing what I can't usually do.
You as a parent need to be the protectors of your children, you shouldn't pawn that responsibility off on government because you think something is not fit to exist. You should teach the values you hold so closely to your children, rather than trying to bring down an industry that has done nothing but severely reduced the ACTUAL violence in our society by replacing it with pixels on a computer screen.
Originally posted by Geladinhu
I find very ironic that the OP has also created this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by ROBL240
yet who are you to say what we can/cant watch, play, see, do with our lives?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by quackers
Ok then, what is it programming them to do?
Look up "desensitation".
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by Geladinhu
I find very ironic that the OP has also created this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
New thread, new topic.
[edit on 20-8-2009 by Skyfloating]