It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Palin and anyone to the right of Stalin is hated by the media, so forget them.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by milesp
A more accurate term for 'shadow government' and 'NWO' would simply be 'Multinational Corporations'. If that's what you're referring to, I agree.
Very definitely, but do not forget the financiers. Take a look at Monsanto (food control) and General Electric ("green energy") The share VOTERS are mutual funds et al
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by insideNSA
2nd i'm not from alaska, LOL... that was the testimony of one of her constituents.
Since you are laughing so loudly about me thinking you are in AK, let's look at your previous post. Hmmmm, I wonder what lead me to believe that, besides having lower than "avg" intelligence, of course...
Originally posted by insideNSA
hey 27ID. show me how she is an idiot with facts? can you? actually the EYE SEE does see... Palin, though not polished has done more good than 10 BOs and has more experience actually leading than 100 Husseins, who just has experience sitting around in the senate voting and speed reading teleprompters.
you are clearly a 'kool-aid' drinker
The last 45 of my 66 years Ive spent in a commercial fishing town in Alaska. I understand Alaska politics but never understood national politics well until this last year. Heres the breaking point: Neither side of the Palin controversy gets Its not about persona, style, rhetoric, its about doing things. Even Palin supporters never mention the things that Im about to mention here.
Okay, so since you just copy and pasted something from "one of her constituents" directly into your post, without mentioning that (which is against the T & C here), can you see how one could get the impression that you are a 66 year old fisherman from AK??
No wonder you're defending Palin so fiercely, birds of a feather...
[edit on 20-8-2009 by 27jd]
Originally posted by Xeven
Originally posted by Andre Neves
Oh look...another thread about Barrack Obama.
Well man he is the President and he should be the topic especially in these troubled times. He is failing and I voted for him. He is playing the games instead of being what he represented to us in his campaign.
I do not think we can actually vote for anyone who would do the right thing anymore. I believe the Corporations and wealthy are in complete control. No one who would do the right thing will ever see their name on a ballot.
Originally posted by Andre Neves
This is the reason I don't visit ATS as often. I used to love this site, but ever since the elections it has been filled with political topics.
Seems that every time I click my ATS tab on my browser and the main page loads up, I am met with a bunch of Anti-Obama topics. Yawwwn!
It's like I just got redirected to politics.com or something.
I mean, how many topics can be made about Obamas birth certificate not being real?
Sorry for the rant, had to get that off my chest.
[edit on 8/20/2009 by Andre Neves]
Originally posted by Republican08
Originally posted by Andre Neves
This is the reason I don't visit ATS as often. I used to love this site, but ever since the elections it has been filled with political topics.
Seems that every time I click my ATS tab on my browser and the main page loads up, I am met with a bunch of Anti-Obama topics. Yawwwn!
It's like I just got redirected to politics.com or something.
I mean, how many topics can be made about Obamas birth certificate not being real?
Sorry for the rant, had to get that off my chest.
[edit on 8/20/2009 by Andre Neves]
You know what helps me.
The Onion, I only watch it on youtube.
But it cracks me up, let's me break off from the regular news.
Take your daughter to war day. lmao.
Originally posted by Absum!
True buyer's remorse;
I thought I purchased hope.
I received Bush in Blackface.
Not amused.
When do we get accountability.
For past sins, and present actions?
Originally posted by kinda kurious
"Could Obama's Career be Over?"
I see no indication of that. Whether he serves 1 term or 2, he will forever be remembered in American history as the first African-American President....
[edit on 20-8-2009 by kinda kurious]
Originally posted by djusdjus
this reads like a foot stamping conservative bleating wishful thinking kind of thread.
could it be that you woke up in some gun laden fantasy world?
Obama ain't goin nowhere and has HUGE support.
just because of a few noisy fascists, the world won't change.
As for GE's 'green energy', I don't buy into the hype of corporate rebranding efforts. GE is no more a 'green' company than Exxon. That being said, a solar and wind power network needs to be developed and GE is currently the largest American manufacturer in those fields. So at least they're ahead of the game on that issue.
Originally posted by romanmel
Obama IS NOT "...the first African-American President."
Barack Hussein Obama II (born August 4, 1961) is the 44th and current President of the United States, the first African American to hold the office.
Obama entered Harvard Law School in 1988. In February 1990, he was elected the first African-American editor of the Harvard Law Review. Obama graduated magna cum laude in 1991.
Barack Obama became the 44th President of the United States and the first African-American to hold this high office.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by Pathos
The economy will rebound, healthcare reform will pass, Iraq and Afghanistan will wind down, and he'll get a second term, and by the time he's done, I think he'll have gotten about 80% of what he set out to do, and ran on, completed, including a comprehensive energy policy, and just maybe a peace deal in Israel-Palestine.
And you were saying? Your grasp on reality seems a tad weak.
Structural Adjustment Policies are economic policies which countries must follow in order to qualify for new World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans and help them make debt repayments on the older debts owed to commercial banks, governments and the World Bank.
Although SAPs are designed for individual countries but have common guiding principles and features which include export-led growth; privatisation and liberalisation; and the efficiency of the free market. SAPs generally require countries to devalue their currencies against the dollar; lift import and export restrictions; balance their budgets and not overspend; and remove price controls and state subsidies....
Balancing national budgets can be done by raising taxes, which the IMF frowns upon, or by cutting government spending, which it definitely recommends. As a result, SAPs often result in deep cuts in programmes like education, health and social care, and the removal of subsidies designed to control the price of basics such as food and milk. So SAPs hurt the poor most, because they depend heavily on these services and subsidies. Source
Originally posted by FlyersFan
His life has been a career of bamboozling and running for office. Nothing more. I don't see an end to that ever happening. Unfortunately.