Actually, I think I am gonna make a actual serious post on this gay thread. heh.

I dont like gay men. I find the idea of public affection between men beyond a quick hug to be something that I find curiously disturbing. I have seen a man kiss another man once and I found it sorta gross.

I also understand that this is a product of my conditioning and that overall there is no great wrong they are doing. If I see two women kissing, I find that exciting..again, product of conditioning at work here.

So, I dont want personally to see men kiss men...but, I accept they should have the right to display certain amounts of public affection like anyone else. The creator has given me the gift of a neck for looking away from things I dont care to see. I have no right to demand others cannot do what I want to do

I am all for painting the White House pink! Think pink!

For all those idiots, who think gay men cant make babies, better think again, because, all gay men can have children, and a lot of them do.

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Yup, I firmly believe that gay men are more superior to straight men, come on now, isn't that why they attempt to opress us so much?

Oh please... we're straight white Americans.

(sinister pause)

We try to oppress everybody.

Originally posted by defiler
1 How would the children develop with gay parents, they will be confused, ridiculed by their friends and if he\she is a weak character the chances are he\she will have a difficult life.

I have actually seen a lot of cases that prove the opposite. And the only reason I learned about them was because of people like you making such assertions without merit. You worry where there need be no worry.

2 How will we as a human race reproduce if being gay is more advanced as someone state then why there are male and female ?

Is having green eyes more "advanced" than having blue eyes? That's your answer.

There are actually scientific studies that have suggested homosexuality (which, remember, is by definition "natural" since it occurs in nature) serves as an antagonist to the female sex drive and so is present in nature to effectively increase female fertility. Ie making them want you guys more because they feel homosexuals are competition to them (and aren't we? ). Thus its natural role. But don't take my word for it, look it up yourself if you actually care either way.

Originally posted by northof8
Indeed, on any given day we can come here and see how the Gays start threads here under the guise of love and understanding but all they are really looking for is a fight.

Just like the OP here. He is a prime example of what is wrong with ATS, yet his thread is on the home page of ATS right at the opening.

The Kernel comes to ATS because of the different topics and points of view. You could probably start a thread on antiquated bigotry, you are certainly qualified. You'll have to put your bottle and Bible down for a few minutes though.

Why does it seem the gay trend is being shoved in our face lately? I don't parade around boasting about being straight. It all seems like attention grabbing to me, and a quite annoying method at that.

Originally posted by RichieScott1
Why does it seem the gay trend is being shoved in our face lately? I don't parade around boasting about being straight. It all seems like attention grabbing to me, and a quite annoying method ahat that.

That because as a straight person we get automatic rights and equality that is taken forgranted.

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
A call to arms if you will my fellow ATS bretheren.

It has been brought to my attention that there is an evil group of people on ATS. Those who love homosexuals. Those who believe that Gays are better than straights, that in all honesty, we should remove straights from the equation.

Those who are opposed to suprresion of speech, equal rights and ideological opression.

I hope this was a typo on your part, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But as it stands you just said that there "is an evil group of people..." "those who are OPPOSED to the suprresion (sic) of speech...and ideological opression (sic)." Therefore, you are a proponent of the the suppression of speech AND a proponent of ideological oppression?

I hope you're just some hateful dolt who wrote without checking what you wrote...otherwise you're a sick fascist!

Otherwise slap a rainbow on my behind and sign me up for team two!

Originally posted by arcnaver
Why isn't there a Straight Rights Movement?

Hell, why not a White Rights movement?

None of us are asking for any privileges you don't already possess. That's why there isn't a straight rights movement.

If SEEING us is oppressive to you, then you NEED to be oppressed! And you're going to have to share this planet with me whether you like it or not!