The problem is you want to win an argument that you're not supposed to win. There are paranormal things and people have seen them. You don't believe
them and so you get mad that you have no way of refuting them. That is unforuntate, but perhaps instead of getting mad at people who have "seen"
things and being prejudice against them for being in the right place at the right time, or looking for answers on their own, maybe you can convince
the scientists to start working on things that could verify things like these. Like maybe cameras that we can implant into our eyeballs and record
everything we see, or a device for reading people's memories. I'm sure one day when science catches up we can get to the bottom of these things but
not now, and unforunately, either you're going to have to settle for not knowing or look for yourself.
On the flip side, people who have had experiences get a lot of grief too and few people believe them. Even other believers don't believe them usually
because there is so much bull out there. Consider this. "I saw a ghost." I really did. Someone else turns around and says "Yeah, well I saw a
unicorn." Now who is going to believe either of them? People lie all the time for various reasons. It is a lot more unfair for a person to have seen
something and be called a liar than for you to lose an argument when you really don't know if what you're arguing against is true. In any regards,
if you don't believe someone, it is better just to blow them off.
If you still want to pursue this test you might have to give out your address (maybe in u2u) so if anyone has this remote viewing or oob ability and
lives near you they may have the opportunity to try it out. A lot of remote viewers claim to only be able to travel short distances. Your work office
might work better.
[edit on 9-7-2009 by theyreadmymind]


.
)
