Bill Gives Attorney General Power To Designate Gun Owners, Tax Protesters As Terrorists, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 62 times


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 01:13 PM by mnemeth1
reply to post by GorehoundLarry



You're missing the point, which Infowars correctly points out for us:

The bill is ostensibly aimed at preventing race “extremists” and gang members from joining the Army, but since the Army already hires felons, criminals, racists and gang members, the real purpose behind the legislation is to codify the move to label gun owners, “anti-government” activists and tax protesters as domestic terrorists, a process that has been ongoing since at least the start of the decade.


The powers are sweeping and broad.

The AG will have the power to designate ANY anti-big government group as a hate group.

It will prevent members of small government groups such as "campaign for liberty" or tea party groups from admission into our armed forces.

Right now, most of the armed forces is composed of freedom loving southerners.

They are fixing to change that, this is just the first step.

Congressman Trent Franks (R-AZ)

“While the amendment seeks to keep gang members and members of violent groups out of the military, the amendment by its language is much more broad. Specifically, it confers upon the Attorney General the ability to categorize groups as hate groups, and this sounds an alarm for many of us because of the recent shocking and offensive report released by the Department of Homeland Security which labeled, arguably, a majority of Americans as “extremists,” warned Franks.

“I take extreme offense that the federal government — through a report issued under the authority of a Cabinet-level official — would dare to categorize people who are “dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition or abortion or immigration” as “right-wing extremists” and it begs the question of whether the Attorney General, under Mr. Hastings’ Amendment, can look to the Napolitano report to decide who is an extremist, or can make the same categorization of the majority of Americans as extremists who may then be kept from joining the military, or who may be discharged,” said Rep. Franks.


Remember, being labeled a member of an extremist group under the Patriot Act now places you in the federal governments line of fire as it pertains to the war on terror.

Its essentially granting the power to the AG to label Americans as terrorists.



[edit on 7-7-2009 by mnemeth1]


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 01:48 PM by GorehoundLarry
That shows you how outdated the constitution is obviously....we all know and can agree that racism isn't the most...civilized manner of our species. It has no part anywhere in our society. And it shouldn't be allowed in our military. Especially when we go into an Islamic nation. We wonder why torture and rape takes place. Racism needs to be removed.

And we know how flawed the military is anyway. Considering the whole gays in the military situation, which Obama fails to acknowledge.

I get it, this bill to keep racists out of the military actually has Nothing to do with...racism or hate in the military. Everything is about Us, everything has to be about sending us to FEMA camps or removing our rights. No bill can ever be about anything else.

We'll see where this bill takes us. I'm betting on: Nowhere bad.

Are we losing our rights and freedom? To an extent. However, this has been happening for years. I just get sick of people claiming it's all Obama who started this.

Did you know that if you own an adult film business or company, and you distribute your film to a state that allows pornography and has no laws regarding to pornography, it's alright. It's fine. Perfectly Legal. However! If that DVD or video or item passes through a state with laws that prohibit such material, you and your company will be fined or you could probably end up behind bars.

Max Hardcore, a pornographer is still in prison because his films were considered obscene. Extreme Associates, a pornographic company ended up in court because their material was deemed obscene. Who makes you a judge to deem something obscene that others find arousing and entertaining?

If you ask me, we've always been losing rights one way or another. If this bill is what you say it is, then it's no surprise.

[edit on 7-7-2009 by GorehoundLarry]


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 01:51 PM by mnemeth1
reply to post by cbianchi513





You are clearly a threat to the government and should be locked up in a FEMA camp for the federal governments protection.

Never mind you served honorably and swore an oath to defend the country against domestic and foreign tyranny.



[edit on 7-7-2009 by mnemeth1]


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 02:05 PM by cbianchi513
reply to post by mnemeth1



Crap! I didn't know they could take my picture through the computer!!!


Yeah, that's me alright... I swear it is.

At least we can still laugh, sometimes.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags
Overpopulation is a scam
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags
Obama/Soros Pushing Class Warfare
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 29 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags