Originally posted by weedwhacker
I think it pretty well discounts 'thermite' fairly conclusively, but I'm no expert.
Please tell me how words on a screen in that thread can discount thermite "fairly conclusively"? And you're correct, you're not an expert and
neither are most of us here. But the scientists with "doctor" in their name
are experts and the experiments were done in labs and more than
once, which = repeatable.
Now, until several scientists with "doctor" in their name can take the same samples and prove in a lab that the chips are
not thermite, then
that would be "fairly conclusive". I have yet to question your skills and experience as a pilot, so why don't you stop questioning other
professional scientists' skills and experience because you don't want to believe in a conspiracy, fair enough?