It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rapacity
I accept some people look to porn for the instruction they ought to be given by society through schooling, parenting and mentoring; but this does not equate to them disregarding right and wrong with regard to non-consensual and extremely violent sexual behavior toward others.
so those activities will never stop but under prohibition will assume the greater luster of taboo.
To me, the fact we need to legislate suggests the majority of people are incapable of civilized behavior (isn't it strange that we must pay people to enforce the laws we require to protect us from ourselves - how fickle and a sham is the surface of human society?).
Rich23, couple of stars handed out to you.
I have a problem with it as a Christian, I wouldn't infringe upon someone's right to purchase it.
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
I thought you stated that you would be okay with the content being forcefully removed just because you disagree with the content, yes? Sorry if I misunderstood you.
Originally posted by AshleyD
With all that said, yes I know I'm coming across as the fuddy duddy and am expressing a very unpopular opinion compared to the majority of members on ATS. Before this gets too far, let me be clear I'm still sticking to my guns though and realize I'm defending a lost cause around here but I'm going to state my opinion anyways. Free speech right?
And if someone uses that word on, let's say, a live television show, they can rightfully be fined under the obscenity laws.
I think it is a tragic sign of our society that so many would chose rape porn of all things to really bring out their 'passion guns' to defend regarding the free speech issue.
We do have obscenity laws for a reason. These people were held responsible under them.
and being actively involved in some organization, campaign, political movement or what not to actively stop such things.
but if you actually believe that judges should be allowed to ban this content...
In that case, although I understand it is unpopular opinion, I do agree with the banning of the content personally.
I just don't believe in an 'anything goes' society and that we protect everything under the umbrella of 'Free Speech.'
If rape porn doesn't make people flinch and it is considered a protected right under free speech, then what about child porn?
As a society, I personally feel we are getting worse and worse for a culture that is supposedly so enlightened and progressive
Then I assume you would vote for the banning of such content just because of your personal grievance though there are no laws broken?
I agree, we do have rules and these people were not illegally breaking any.
...pleaded guilty in March to a felony charge of conspiracy to distribute obscene material through the mail and over the Internet...
The couple, in their plea agreement, acknowledged distributing three videos through the mail and six video clips over the Internet to western Pennsylvania...
Child porn and rape should not be used as examples in putting down simulated actions between two consenting adults. The two are unrelated for two big reason, one is legal and one is not, one involves victims and one does not.
Originally posted by Solomons
How can you honestly criminalize two adults who voluntarily consented to perform a sexual act with each other.
So how can you say they weren't doing anything illegal?
Judge Lancaster wrote: "the federal obscenity statutes violate the constitutional guarantees of personal liberty and privacy of consenting adults who wish to view the defendants' films in private."
Not true- simulated child porn is still illegal in some places.
I think it is a tragic sign of our society that so many would chose rape porn
We do have obscenity laws for a reason. These people were held responsible under them.
1. Whether the average person would find that the work, taken as a whole and applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest;
2. Whether the work depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, when applying contemporary community standards; and
3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
I hope that for those of us that oppose these vague obscenity laws that we aren't being viewed as uncompassionate.
The test itself doesn't even mention sexual content.
2. Whether the work depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, when applying contemporary community standards; and
I guess as a mother I find it appalling to see children made out to be sexual objects, even in animation or digitally.
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
I really don't like to use any form of slippery slope arguments because they are usually a bunch of bunk...
...but we have seen that there is a slippery slope when it comes to censorship.
What about #2?
I guess as a mother I find it appalling to see children made out to be sexual objects, even in animation or digitally.