Couple gets prison time for Internet obscenity, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times
Topic started on 3-7-2009 @ 07:51 PM by TheAssociate

Couple gets prison time for Internet obscenity


www.pcworld.idg.com.au
"Extreme Associates produced and distributed sexually degrading material that portrayed women in the most vile and depraved manner imaginable," U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan, of the Western District of Pennsylvania, said in a statement. "These prison sentences affirm the need to continue to protect the public from obscene, lewd, lascivious or filthy material, the production of which degrades all of us."
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 08:44 PM by TheAssociate
reply to post by Phlegmi



I hope the sentence doesn't hold. This case could set a very dangerous precedent if it is upheld.


TA


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 09:06 PM by TheAssociate
reply to post by nixie_nox



If what's happening in the material (video, magazine, whatever) is consensual and is happening among adults (humans), the government has no right to intervene. The article didn't mention what type of porn, but I don't think it was any of the type you're referring to.


TA


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 09:10 PM by TheAssociate
Here we go:

A husband and wife from California will each spend a year and a day in prison for distributing violent sex videos depicting simulated rape and murder.
source


The key word there is 'simulated.' In other words, nobody was coerced into doing anything. If consenting adults wish to make these types of videos, that's their business. There's no reason these people should be jailed for this. Regardless of how tasteless this type of porn is, nobody has a right to tell someone they can't make or view it.


TA

[edit on 3-7-2009 by TheAssociate]



reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 12:31 AM by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The pornographer and star of the Max Hardcore series was convicted of a Federal Case based on a similiar prosecution about 8 months ago in Tallahassee Florida.

The Max Hardcore series as it's name might suggest featured sexual acts most people typically don't 'get' to enjoy.

I can't remember who it was but another well known pornographer that specialized in D/s and BDSM films was charged with a similiar suit shortly after that and also convicted.

Both Prosecutors, both Judges and both Juries found that nature of the films and the acts depicted to be highly offensive to them.

This is part of a continueing trend of the Federal and now State Governments not so much legislating morality but what is appropriate sexual behavior.

Even though neither company operated or filmed in the Federal Districts that the defendants were prosecuted in, in each case those jurisdictions claimed because the films and video were for sale to members of that community through the mail or internet that they had jurisdiction to prosecute these pornographers as a crime.

This is a very disturbing trend that infringes on the right to free expression.

As long as the actors are paid and consenting adults and the people purchasing or accessing the material are consenting adults it truly is not the government's business.

Pornographers Lizzy Borden and Rob Black (a.k.a. Robert Zicari and Janet Romano) today entered guilty pleas in the obscenity case that they have been fighting in court since 2003.

Time Magazine has said that "even among hardcore pornographers, Rob Black is considered a sleazebag," which would imply, of course, that all hardcore pornographers are sleazy--and we happen to know several who are totally upstanding citizens! But Black and Borden's work, which includes extremely rough and scary depictions of rape, torture and "the depths of human depravity" garnered the attention of the Justice Department under John Ashcroft, made them household names in Congress, landing them on PBS and Nightline.


Longest Running Obscenity Trial in History

Tampa, Florida (October 3, 2008): The infamous pornographer Max Hardcore was convicted in a federal court in Tampa, Florida for producing fetish videos featuring scat and urine, as well as "humiliation" videos featuring the infliction of pain and degrading sex acts on his female "co-stars." The man who had beat a federal kiddy porn rap back in 2002 was convicted on June 5, 2008 on federal charges of distributing obscenity via the Internet and the U.S. mails. His sentencing was postponed until October, during which time he cranked out another two of his nasty videos.


Max Hardcore Sentenced to Jail

While a lot of people (maybe even ATS) might say such films and people are too over the top...who then ultimately decides what isn't taboo sexually amongst consenting adults and where does it end?

Hopefully not with test tubes!


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 01:33 AM by Miraj
reply to post by TheAssociate



So much for the first Ammendment. Which one will they target next?

Second line


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 02:07 AM by Sundancer
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi



I have worked for years in an industry where people (usually fat ugly woman) protest it, saying it's obscene and offensive and degrading to me. I don't feel in the least degraded or offended when I'm paying for private schools for my kids. If I felt degraded I'd get a job in the area that I have a degree for, the degree I paid for while I was being degraded NOT.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies