Originally posted by BREWSE
I honestly believe there was never any intent to HOAX anyone...
THANK YOU ENORMOUSLY.
You are entirely 100% correct, of course.
And it does not take a psychologist to have known that.
Probably a 12 year old could have figured that out by the end of the first page.
[quoute]
I'm glad no shakin occurred, I still have much to do before the scarier stuff starts...Take everything with a grain of salt...
I agree on that score, too.
BTW, FWIW,
I had a 70 minute phone call with my FREEPER BRO on the East coast who, in some respects, started this with his example I used in the OP to introduce my questions and the whole issue of END TIMES PROPHECIES about coming traumatic festivities.
As I understand it, I'm authorized to say the following from him:
1. He asserted that a number of things happen but are hidden by the powers that be. He wondered if that might be the case here.
I don't think that was so because his prediction specifically noted that folks would see something in the skies and the result would be the FEAR OF GOD within them. That, to me, precludes an event happening but successfully hidden by anyone or any power.
2. He felt that the 2nd possibility was that he was simply wrong, heard wrong.
He does not want to defend himself.
I found my Christian Bro to be a soul very like minded as myself and who has also been created, trained and conditioned much like myself--yet, imho, who is quite a bit ahead of me spiritually and cheers to him for that.
I found him quite candid, honest, humble, . . . yet very experienced, knowledgeable and servant-hearted.
I think he has a fiercely genuine passion for God as well as for the lost and to minster to Christ's Body and the world.
He had had quite a lot of training and experience in deliverance.
He noted that one of his mentors exhorted him to avoid seeking many prophetic messages from God but to seek to be absolutely accurate.
He certainly acknowledges still being a work in progress as we all are.
##############
It is fascinating that one of the respondents on this thread most illogically screams about the Terms and Conditions regarding hoaxes . . .
yet brazenly and persistently violates them regarding being discourteous and personally brazenly assaultive.
That duplicity is unimpressive.
[edit on 2/7/2009 by BO XIAN]



