It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ntity
Another problem with this bill is the unforeseen repercussions.
America will have an international problem with cap and trade. How will it compete with the countries that don't have it?
But what about other countries like China and India. There's no way they'll play along. They'll issue tariffs right back at the US. Some might say, "Yay, too cool. Buy American", but if that happens once more you're looking at another inflationary hit. Local prices already rising from the spin-off effects of cap and trade, rise once more in reaction to the inflated prices of foreign goods, as a battle of protectionism begins. The worth of the American dollar takes a dump.
Originally posted by auntie_11k
Our Power and Light company reported this bill will raise energy prices 50% over the next four years. This is very significant hike. I mean a 50% hike in a recession? Not to mention everything else this will affect.
Just before the House passed what could end up being the largest tax increase in U.S. history, Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Oh.) took to the floor and dissected the disgusting "American Clean Energy and Security Act" while accusing Democrats of shamefully adding 300 pages to the bill at 3 AM Friday morning.
Originally posted by eldard
The demise of your country has started. And the world is rejoicing.
* Solar activity a greater climate change driver than man
* '0.1 per cent of carbon dioxide due to human activity'
* Geologist says he doesn't care if no-one agrees
MANKIND is naive to think it can influence climate change, according to a prize-winning Australian geologist.
Solar activity is a greater driver of climate change than man-made carbon dioxide, argues Ian Plimer, Professor of Mining Geology at the University of Adelaide and winner of several notable science prizes. “When meteorologists can change the weather then we can start to think about humans changing climate,” Prof Plimer said.
“I think we really are a little bit naive to think we can change astronomical and solar processes.”
A PROMINENT geologist Ian Plimer has labelled climate change theory an "ascientific, urban, religious, fundamentalist movement" promoted by academics and activists who would be "unemployable outside taxpayer-funded climate institutes".
Originally posted by BlackOps719
Hey let's also invent a tax that can be levied against cows who fart and the farmers who feed them!!!
After posting below about the Methane Produced in Cow Farts is affecting the environment so they can tax us which will increase cost and stunt to growth of the meat industries.
I thought I should actually do some research on the matter and see how much Methane is actually being produced by our farm friends and how it is affecting the environment.
First thing Methane is a “Naturally” occurring gas -
Of the Greenhouse gases currently in the atmosphere approx only 0.00017% is methane.
One article I read in 2004 didn’t even mention livestock - “The No. 1 source of our nation’s anthropogenic methane emissions, by contrast, is the decomposition of garbage in landfills”
I guess 5 years ago there were less vegans in politics and the government wasn’t in dire need of money.
In more recent studies (this is my favorite part) guess where 30% of the worlds Methane comes from…..PLANTS!!!! that’s right plants, here we are planting trees to reduce C02 emissions and we are creating more Methane, there’s one for the greenies .
“To their amazement, the scientists found that all the textbooks written on the biochemistry of plants had apparently overlooked the fact that methane is produced by a range of plants even when there is plenty of oxygen.”
So Methane is a naturally occurring gas….so why is it bad??
Methane traps 20x more heat then C02 does, however it has an Atmospheric life of approx 7 years in comparison to C02 which can last 50 - 200 years.
Now the Irony - Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change:
The Kyoto Protocol allows countries and companies to offset emissions from the burning of fossil fuels like coal and oil by funding the planting of new forests or the restoration of deforested areas.
So… we are allowing countries to pump more C02 into the air as long as they “offset” it by planting more trees….??? which will create more methane….???? *insert Scooby Doo Confused looked here*
All in all I don’t know how bad Methane is but because it is a naturally occurring gas maybe there is something we are missing maybe it has another function, i don’t know of anything naturally created that harms the earth. A 1000 years ago there was a lot more trees, animals and Natural Methane deposits seeping methane into our atmosphere I think there would have been more then compared to now.
1 more Question:
Why is it that me a high school drop out can spend a few hours on the Internet collaborate all the above info and come to the conclusion that taxing cow farts isn’t going to help save the environment, yet there are politicians, the EPA and Vegans who say it is??? I’ll tell you why… because that’s what they are paid to do
Source, Source, Source, Source, Source,Source, Source, Source, Source
Also take note -The fact that plants release Methane has not been mentioned since 2006…. something for you to think about
Originally posted by xmaddness
As I am reading through this thread it becomes apparent that most of the people who are against this bill are simply worried about money. The shortsightedness of this is amazing to me.
Originally posted by wycky
Sick Ian Pilmer on them, i heard on the Radio he went abit crazy about all tis man made climate change BS.
* Solar activity a greater climate change driver than man
* '0.1 per cent of carbon dioxide due to human activity'
* Geologist says he doesn't care if no-one agrees
MANKIND is naive to think it can influence climate change, according to a prize-winning Australian geologist.
Solar activity is a greater driver of climate change than man-made carbon dioxide, argues Ian Plimer, Professor of Mining Geology at the University of Adelaide and winner of several notable science prizes. “When meteorologists can change the weather then we can start to think about humans changing climate,” Prof Plimer said.
“I think we really are a little bit naive to think we can change astronomical and solar processes.”
www.news.com.au...
Also good to see he got some MSM attention
More info about Ian and his work here www.sciencealert.com.au...
Also just came across this and thought it was well said and worth posting
A PROMINENT geologist Ian Plimer has labelled climate change theory an "ascientific, urban, religious, fundamentalist movement" promoted by academics and activists who would be "unemployable outside taxpayer-funded climate institutes".
www.theaustralian.news.com.au...
[edit on 29/6/2009 by wycky]
Cassini has informed us that Enceladus generates its own heat. Its high temperatures seem to be incompatible with calculations based on solar energy itself, according to existing models.
..would require drastic cuts in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century, cutting emissions across the entire economy to 17 percent of 2005 levels by 2050, meaning that the economy would be forced to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 83 percent by 2050
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Polluting is bad. CO2 needs to be processed by trees to create Oxygen.
You stop cutting down the rainforest and replant what you all cut down.
Then you can go on throwing more of our greedy waste back into the air.
I will never agree with our government!
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Polluting is bad. CO2 needs to be processed by trees to create Oxygen.
You stop cutting down the rainforest and replant what you all cut down.
Then you can go on throwing more of our greedy waste back into the air.
You do realize that by the very act of breathing, you are polluting the planet, by your own definition. This is because you are exhaling that evil CO2 pollutant into our atmosphere.
Which is of course YOUR contribution to our "greedy waste" load, and it's being thrown DIRECTLY into the air.
I'm writing my congress critters, see if I can't get another tax slapped on that.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Everyone who posted in this thread and said the bill was bad w/o reading the bill is a tool.