SC Gov Sanfod Not Missing But Is Actually Meeting Co Revolutionaries?, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 02:36 PM by Cloudsinthesky
reply to post by kosmicjack



This will give the media something to talk about as the House slides through HR 2454 on Friday

Everyone will be looking at the right hand.........while the left hand is once again in the cookie jar.........

[edit on 24-6-2009 by Cloudsinthesky]


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 02:39 PM by jibeho
reply to post by Cloudsinthesky



Nothing like a good distraction. However, HR 2454 is still going to be a tough sell. If it successfully moves through the House and Senate we can kiss our wallets goodbye.



reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 02:41 PM by Cloudsinthesky
reply to post by jibeho



The word I am getting its a done deal.........As I posted somewhere else......its one of the many death daggers that will kill America.......


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 02:44 PM by jibeho
reply to post by Cloudsinthesky



Enjoy your carbon output while you can!!! I am going to go carbon crazy. I may even have a dastardly bonfire in my back yard and burn an open drum of oil just out of spite. I love the smell of burning fossil fuels in the morning....


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 03:01 PM by A NeWorlDisorder
reply to post by tsloan



Where the hell is he gonna go? He cant go up, not with the state of the Republican Party these days. With Obama you will need a spotless canidate to even come close to having a chance at the White House. Sandford has also done some pretty crappy things to the people of South Carolina in the past couple of years. No, Sandford is not recyclable and if the Republicans are so desperate to look to him for anything it will be a huge sign marking the end of the Republican Party in the United States.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 03:08 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by A NeWorlDisorder



With Obama you will need a spotless canidate to even come close to having a chance at the White House.


I guess you mean to challenge Obama for the Whitehouse, because you certainly don't need a spotless candidate to serve in any of his cabinet or czar positions! I can't remember a president ever having to move to his 2nd or 3rd or 4th choice to fill cabinet positions before?

But, you are correct. To challenge Obama for POTUS, you will need a gender neutral, blended race, foreign national, born(as a US citizen) in Somalia but raised in Kansas, who loves Jesus, but plays golf with the grays, and faces Mecca to pray!



reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 03:17 PM by xxpigxx
reply to post by grover



No, but they found nothing until he returned on a plane.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 03:32 PM by GreenGlassDoor
reply to post by tjeffersonsghost





Unfortunately, I don't view it as too misleading. All that we have now are Democrat and Democrat-Lite.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 03:45 PM by SGTChas
reply to post by awakentired



Remembering some of the commentary of the prerevolutionary newspapers throughout New England, you certainly agree with them.



reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 03:55 PM by SGTChas
reply to post by getreadyalready



I have spoken in other threads of the expatriate Americans that have prepared for years in South America. This is not a big secret, both Argentina and Costa Rica have large communities of former American service personnel and members of Air America.

Ridicule and scorn of Republicans is deserved, both them and the Democrats are guilty of treason; I hope there is not a low supply of good rope.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 04:10 PM by awakentired
reply to post by SGTChas



LoL
That, my friend, was a different time and age. One f18 could change the outcome of the battle of ground troops. Different entirely.
Heck forget fixed wing and put up Apaches loaded with harm missiles for broadcast stations.
Too much infrastructure is needed to be on top at the end of the day.
Sadly true.
Unless a mass appeal incident incites the nation and that is the card that the ptb is protecting by taking all the rights away.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 04:19 PM by awakentired
reply to post by awakentired



I can see a Tiananmen Square incident on one coast and the other coast would know nothing about it. Even if a patriot in broadcasting trys to usurp authority it would be squashed by the fcc hitting the emergency elert button.
Cell towers shut down on the push of a button, Internet disabled etc.

The only possible means of communications ..rather C&C is HAM/CB. That technology exists but in much smaller numbers than in the 70s even.

OBTW I am not a shirker. I and my father/grandfather did our time in the USMC. However, I'd prefer not to take a rock to a gunfight either.


reply posted on 24-6-2009 @ 04:21 PM by jibeho
reply to post by tjeffersonsghost



Fox is the only news outlet that actually identifies the affiliation of politicians regardless of party. However the MSM only identifies Republicans involved in scandals but fails to cite Democrats in scandals. Take a sharp left on the one way street...

Case in point.

For the third evening in a row Wednesday, the NBC Nightly News refused to identify Eliot Spitzer as a Democrat, but after ABC's World News failed to cite his party affiliation on Monday and Tuesday night when Elizabeth Vargas anchored, on Wednesday evening substitute anchor George Stephanopoulos finally properly tagged him: “The Democrat resigned today just two days after reports that he patronized a high-priced prostitution service.”


newsbusters.org...

So how do the networks treat Republicans involved in sex scandals? Always, always as Republicans, and as problems for their party. Last July, Louisiana Senator David Vitter’s name surfaced in the phone records of the “DC Madam,” Deborah Jean Palfrey. Over the next week, ABC talked about Vitter twice on World News and twice on Good Morning America, labeling him as a “Republican” or “conservative Republican” all four times.


he list of examples goes on, but the bottom line is that in the early days of their scandals, Vitter and Craig were labeled as Republicans on every broadcast news program — 100% — that mentioned their wrongdoing. For Democrat Spitzer, four out of five news programs (80%) have skipped his label. On NBC’s Today and Nightly News through Wednesday night, reporters never once acknowledged that Spitzer was a Democrat. The media’s message: Republicans enmeshed in personal scandal are a moral stain on their entire party; Democrats in similar circumstances are just individuals, not “Democrats” — and certainly not representatives of the liberal cause.


newsbusters.org...
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 19 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 13 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 17 days ago with 37 member flags
The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
Invasion of Korea underway
  Posted 2 days ago with 10 member flags