Are the soldiers who protect America bad?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 06:51 PM by network dude
reply to post by badmedia



you are not going to like this at all, but the reason you, I , and everyone else in America are loosing freedom, is because we as a whole are lazy. Every one of us. You, me, them. We would rather sit here and type about how wrong we are being done, But we are not willing to march, or protest, or go to Washington and Stand up. We would rather complain. Here on ATS there are roughly 12,000 members I think. Out of those, the overwhelming majority know why you are mad at the government. Out there, in the world, most, I repeat, MOST people have no idea why you are mad. They don't even know they lost rights. What are you going to do about it? I await your answer.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 06:54 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by badmedia



Those defending it are the victims of propaganda. The first thing they do when you go to bootcamp is indoctrinate you into the 'mob mentality'. Basically, they empty out your brain and fill it with their way of thinking. Most former military members get over it a few years after they get out and begin to think for themselves again, but it's a process and takes time. There are a few who never buy into it (I was one) and see the world for what it is. Remember that most people are still very young and impressionable when they join up, and are still pretty young when the get out (18 when they join and only 22 when discharged). Remember to consider the source before you judge. Young people sometimes believe and say things that years later when they are older and wiser they regret. This does not make them 'bad', just misguided.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 06:54 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by network dude



I answered you question as best I could. I don't believe the military is fighting or dying for my freedom, they are fighting for the rich.

You said...


Think about a band of bullys with guns walking up to you and taking that Twinkie right out of your hand.


It is happening everyday in the US, only they aren't just taking twinkies (I'd gladly give em a frigging twinke).
They are seizing our homes, our cars, and our bank accounts using the power they have acquired from stealing our freedoms. You said you didn't care about protecting us, you cared about protecting our freedoms. What happened?

We're not mudslinging we're pointing out that every time we get "protected" during one of these invasions, we lose more freedoms.



reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:07 PM by network dude
reply to post by Sundancer



no, you did not answer my question. If there was no military, who would protect you? Who would keep you safe and free from outside tyranny?

The domestic tyranny is something we have to fix as citizens.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:07 PM by badmedia
Originally posted by network dude
reply to
post by badmedia



you are not going to like this at all, but the reason you, I , and everyone else in America are loosing freedom, is because we as a whole are lazy. Every one of us. You, me, them. We would rather sit here and type about how wrong we are being done, But we are not willing to march, or protest, or go to Washington and Stand up. We would rather complain. Here on ATS there are roughly 12,000 members I think. Out of those, the overwhelming majority know why you are mad at the government. Out there, in the world, most, I repeat, MOST people have no idea why you are mad. They don't even know they lost rights. What are you going to do about it? I await your answer.


I'm not going to do anything about it. I think the people are getting exactly what they deserve. They do not understand the true price of freedom, and so they will not get it. They have openly asked for everything we have. In their actions and usually bias over wanting to control another they have themselves said it is ok for someone else to control them.

As it turns out, when you decide you want to choose for another person, say on things like gay marriage, or on the other "side" wanting to choose how much another person should give to welfare etc or whatever, what you are actually saying is "It is ok for 1 person to decide and control another person". Sure, they do it because they think they are getting what they want, but they have given that ok.

Who am I to stop them from getting what they deserve?

But don't tell me they are fighting for my freedoms, because they aren't. And don't ask me to agree with things as being right, because they aren't.

And if someday, the American public should happen to wake up and no longer say those things are ok, then great. Until then, they get what they deserve. And that is not me being hateful, that is just the simple fact of the matter. Can't live in a society without theft if you are a theif, your very presence makes it impossible. Can't live in a society that is free, if you yourself are not willing to give that freedom to others, and you certainly can't live in a world without wars if you yourself cause and support wars.

All I can do is my part and not contribute to such things and point them out for what they are.

But again, if they are fighting for my freedom as is the claim, then prove it.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:25 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by network dude



You said you weren't fighting to protect us, that you were fighting to protect our freedom.
I'm saying... I don't see anyone fighting right now in the middle east as protecting my freedom! They are protecting the interests of the rich. My uncle works for blackwater he's protecting the interests of the rich in the middle east - not me, same as the US military - only he gets paid better and doesn't claim he's there for my freedom.



reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:29 PM by network dude
reply to post by badmedia



could you please point to anywhere in my question that I mentioned the war in Iraq. I didn't. I already said, the war in Iraq was something I did not agree with, no do I agree with any war. War is waged by cowards with money and fraught by heroes win none. But a soldier is there for the simple purpose to defend the USA. That is why they volunteered. Whether they accomplish that goal or not remains to be seen, but as of 8:28pm on Friday night, you still are in a free country supported by soldiers.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:32 PM by badmedia
reply to post by JaxonRoberts



I joined the military at the age of 18, so I actually understand all that. My little brother is in Iraq right now.

I do not blame those who get stuck in a situation. I do not blame those who are simply misguided. But I do blame and argue against those who support the actions.

I'm not going to pretend they are doing the right thing just so they can feel good. Especially when to do so is to support the continuance of those same actions.

I'm not going to go spit on the troops, and don't hate them. Being in the military I know most of them are just regular folks no different than those you meet on the streets. Very few are really anything like the way movies and commercials portray them, and the majority of us kind of rolled our eyes at them(called them suck ups, but not in such a nice manner).

I understand, but it doesn't make it right. And sooner or later people are going to have to realize it.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:36 PM by network dude
reply to post by Sundancer



what about the good things that the soldiers are doing? They are in the middle east helping citizens. They are building schools, and making sure it is safe for the kids to get to them. Ask any soldier if he likes going to war over training in Montana. I can tell you what his answer will be. You are still missing the 800 pound gorilla in the middle of the room. Because there are soldiers, because there is a military, nobody will come here and threaten your freedom. What the government is doing to your freedom, they are doing right in front of you on C-SPAN. And you are just sitting there. I am just sitting there. I am waiting for a leader. I will be there to do my part. Will you?


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:37 PM by badmedia
Originally posted by network dude
reply to
post by badmedia



could you please point to anywhere in my question that I mentioned the war in Iraq. I didn't. I already said, the war in Iraq was something I did not agree with, no do I agree with any war. War is waged by cowards with money and fraught by heroes win none. But a soldier is there for the simple purpose to defend the USA. That is why they volunteered. Whether they accomplish that goal or not remains to be seen, but as of 8:28pm on Friday night, you still are in a free country supported by soldiers.


I understand, truly I do. I understand they signed up for that. I signed up for that reason. But the question remains - is that what they are actually doing.

This is why it's bad to think of things in terms of groups. The bad hides behind the good. In this case, the bad is hiding behind those who signed up and want to do noble things. IMO, the bad must be pointed out. Think of the troops who signed up because they want to defend your freedom and ignore the rest. No, I won't do it.

I'm also in a "free" country with a bunch of drug addicts, lieing politicians and priests who touch little boys. Are they also keeping me free? And what about all the countries with military and no freedom? As it turns out, military != freedom. Military = borders you can control.



[edit on 19-6-2009 by badmedia]


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:41 PM by badmedia
Originally posted by network dude
reply to
post by Sundancer



what about the good things that the soldiers are doing? They are in the middle east helping citizens. They are building schools, and making sure it is safe for the kids to get to them. Ask any soldier if he likes going to war over training in Montana. I can tell you what his answer will be. You are still missing the 800 pound gorilla in the middle of the room. Because there are soldiers, because there is a military, nobody will come here and threaten your freedom. What the government is doing to your freedom, they are doing right in front of you on C-SPAN. And you are just sitting there. I am just sitting there. I am waiting for a leader. I will be there to do my part. Will you?


Yes, please stare at the left hand while the right hand is busy doing other things. Pay no mind to the other hand folks, it's only the good hand you should be looking at. Pay no attention to the things going on, pay attention to our good intentions. Because it really is "for the children", it really is "for freedom and democracy". Look at all these good things being done. Look, we are rebuilding the schools we bombed. We are doing good things.

Sorry, I know how slight of hand and illusions work. I look at both hands, not just the hand you try to draw attention too.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 07:49 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by network dude





I am waiting for a leader. I will be there to do my part. Will you?


Nope, won't be there. For years I tried to warn people about what was happening. I tried to get people to stand together. No one listened.

I left - I'm done trying.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 08:08 PM by hotpinkurinalmint
reply to post by Dean Goldberry



The only thing I can think of that the military has done for the average US citizen is that the first gulf war helped keep the market for oil from going haywire. If Sadaam Hussein took over a large chunk of the middle east, it could have hurt the average person at the gas pump.

Of course, paying a little less at the gas pump may not qualify as freedom. You might be correct in pointing out that the means amount of money the US spent on defense and the first gulf war could have been spent on better things. You might also be correct by pointing out the second Iraq war led to higher gas prices.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 08:15 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by hotpinkurinalmint



Oh, ouch, you'd better get the ice pack out. You're going to get some air smack downs for sure for that one lol.

I have to agree, it would be better for both the US taxpayer and the entire world if we had a much smaller military. Mexico doesn't need bases in every country and neither do we.


reply posted on 19-6-2009 @ 08:19 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Dean Goldberry



From 1946 to 2001, you would be absolutely right, but that reflects on the idiots in Washington and their piss poor decisions in regards to where and when to deploy our troops. The Afghan War, however, has protected your freedom, most notably your freedom to not be terrorized on your own soil. If we had not gone into Afghanistan, Al Queada would still be a significant threat and would have probably struck again and again. Now they are a fractured toothless band of punks. It was the only decision that Bush the window licker made that I agreed with. Iraq on the otherhand falls under the piss poor decision making category. We went there 'cuz he had 'Daddy issues'! I'll say it again, "Don't hate the player (soldiers and sailors), hate the Game (Washington beauracrats protecting their wallets)!"
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 14 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags
U.S. Navy to test 32 megajoule EM Railgun in the coming weeks
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags