AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Military and Government Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Are the soldiers who protect America bad?


<<  14    15    16    17  >>



reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 06:36 PM by Indie Girl


Right or wrong, they do volunteer, good thing they do, because if these people stopped volunteering...some of us wouldn't be on here talking about this.

[edit on 1-7-2009 by Indie Girl]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 06:49 PM by jerico65


reply to post by Majestic23



OK, now I get you!!

It's Ok for countries like the Soviet Union to mess around in third world countries, but the US shouldn't have! Because in most of the countries you listed, the Soviets were there, too.

Two wrongs don't make a right, but putting the blinders on like you are isn't right, either.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 07:09 PM by Majestic23


Originally posted by jerico65
It's Ok for countries like the Soviet Union to mess around in third world countries, but the US shouldn't have! Because in most of the countries you listed, the Soviets were there, too.

Two wrongs don't make a right, but putting the blinders on like you are isn't right, either.



Where did anyone say its ok for any country to do that?

Stop thinking in terms of countries and start thnking in terms of power play.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 07:10 PM by Majestic23


Originally posted by Indie Girl
Right or wrong, they do volunteer, good thing they do, because if these people stopped volunteering...some of us wouldn't be on here talking about this.

[edit on 1-7-2009 by Indie Girl]


Please explain why that is the case.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 02:51 AM by riff_raff


majestic23,

Here's your explanation: The mullahs in Iran are executing Iranian citizens for speaking out against the corrupt election results in their country.

And the response from our "courageous" president Obama and speaker Pelosi has been nothing but deafening silence.

Compare that to President Reagan standing at the foot of the Berlin Wall calling out Gorbachev.

Thankfully, Obama will be gone by Nov. 2012.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 10:23 AM by Majestic23


Originally posted by riff_raff
majestic23,

Here's your explanation: The mullahs in Iran are executing Iranian citizens for speaking out against the corrupt election results in their country.

And the response from our "courageous" president Obama and speaker Pelosi has been nothing but deafening silence.

Compare that to President Reagan standing at the foot of the Berlin Wall calling out Gorbachev.

Thankfully, Obama will be gone by Nov. 2012.


Iam sorry Riff Raff mate you have lost me there. What does that explain?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 11:22 AM by JaxonRoberts


reply to post by Majestic23



It explains nothing. Just another Obama basher come to 'save' us all. The difference between our relationship with Iran and our relationship with the former USSR at the time of Reagan's speech is huge. Reagan's words did not fall on deaf ears, whereas if Obama where to take a simular stance and tone with Iran, it would be used against us in less than a heartbeat. The secret of good diplomacy is the same as the secret of good comedy: TIMING!



   copyright & usage 


<<  14    15    16    17  >>

















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.036 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.