It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rising Against
Originally posted by LiveForever8
Sepp Blatter is in the crowd - I hope he's embarrassed.
*sarcastically applauds Sepp Blatter*
Good decision not getting goal line technology Sepp...Real good decision!
IFAB is made up of representatives from each of the United Kingdom's pioneering football associations — England's Football Association (The FA), the Scottish Football Association (SFA), the Football Association of Wales (FAW) and Northern Ireland's Irish Football Association (IFA) — and Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), the international governing body for football. Each UK association has one vote and FIFA has four. IFAB deliberations must be approved by at least six votes. Thus, FIFA's approval is necessary for any IFAB decision, but FIFA alone cannot change the Laws of the Game; they need to be agreed by at least two of the UK members.
(Source)
Blatter chaired the IFAB on Zurich on Saturday and, as yet, has not commented on arguably the most contentious recent decision taken by the rule-makers of world football.
But in his column for FIFA.com, he said the universality of the game was paramount.
"The game must be played in the same way no matter where you are in the world," Blatter wrote.
"If you are coaching a group of teenagers in any small town around the world, they will be playing with the same rules as the professional players they see on TV.
"The simplicity and universality of the game of association football is one of the reasons for its success.
"Men, women, children, amateurs and professionals all play the same game all over the world.
"No matter which technology is applied, at the end of the day a decision will have to be taken by a human being.
"This being the case, why remove the responsibility from the referee to give it to someone else?
"It is often the case that, even after a slow-motion replay, ten different experts will have ten different opinions on what the decision should have been.
"Fans love to debate any given incident in a game.
"It is part of the human nature of our sport.”
"FIFA’s goal is to improve the quality of refereeing, making referees more professional and better prepared, and to assist referees as much as possible.
"This is also the reason why refereeing experiments [such as with additional referees or the role of the fourth official] will continue to be analysed, to see how referees can be supported."
Originally posted by Rising Against
reply to post by Mdv2
(Source)
Blatter chaired the IFAB on Zurich on Saturday and, as yet, has not commented on arguably the most contentious recent decision taken by the rule-makers of world football.
But in his column for FIFA.com, he said the universality of the game was paramount.
"The game must be played in the same way no matter where you are in the world," Blatter wrote.
"If you are coaching a group of teenagers in any small town around the world, they will be playing with the same rules as the professional players they see on TV.
"The simplicity and universality of the game of association football is one of the reasons for its success.
"Men, women, children, amateurs and professionals all play the same game all over the world.
"No matter which technology is applied, at the end of the day a decision will have to be taken by a human being.
"This being the case, why remove the responsibility from the referee to give it to someone else?
"It is often the case that, even after a slow-motion replay, ten different experts will have ten different opinions on what the decision should have been.
"Fans love to debate any given incident in a game.
"It is part of the human nature of our sport.”
"FIFA’s goal is to improve the quality of refereeing, making referees more professional and better prepared, and to assist referees as much as possible.
"This is also the reason why refereeing experiments [such as with additional referees or the role of the fourth official] will continue to be analysed, to see how referees can be supported."
"No matter which technology is applied, at the end of the day a decision will have to be taken by a human being.
Originally posted by Mdv2
Argentinina scores an offside goal
Originally posted by budski
Germany weren't great, England were crap.