It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cnuum
If you look at the video in OP, you can see many non-parabolic flight paths where the velocity tails have been marked. Right at the beginning of sequence 1, there's an object in the upper left edge heading right, but it makes a few discrete turns - not constant curving - towards the top of the tether. So there's no constant force acting on that object and many others, but their speed and heading are modified at certain moments of time.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Komodo
The satellite, the tether and the shuttle were all moving at the same speed, but the satellite was on a higher orbit, so when the tether broke, the satellite/tether moved to a higher (but slower) orbit.
The increasing in the distance was mostly because the shuttle was now moving faster than the tether.
And I don't understand where did you got that "100NM/4 mins" figure.
The satellite, the tether and the shuttle were all moving at the same speed,
The increasing in the distance was mostly because the shuttle was now moving faster than the tether.
Originally posted by Komodo
1). The shuttle was towing the Sat when it broke, meaning the shuttle was under power. correct ?
2). In the video, the narrator is stating how far the Sat is away from the shuttle by announcing it in Nautical miles.
3). So, the shuttle is still under power and moving AWAY from the tether or is it at a dead stop and the Sat is moving away ??
Which doesn't make sense, because the tether broke ,
They are at the same time at different objects.
the reaction and navigation system
Originally posted by ArMaP
Just a question to everybody, where did you got those numbers for the cost of the satellite?
Originally posted by zorgon
If something were to come to a 'dead stop' in space... the planet and solar system would speed away from that object at 574,585 MPH (Approx Speed of Earth within Our Galaxy) Now if you want to leave the galaxy add another 1,339,200 MPH to the calculations.
So 'standing still' in space is not a very good idea
Originally posted by JScytalethats actually impossible under relativity.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by JScytalethats actually impossible under relativity.
PFFTT That Einstein dude had it all wrong...
except that one quote of his
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistant one" Albert Einstein. Qauntum Mechanics is proving that
STS-46... the only actual image I have in my collection
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cb0dbf0f433f.jpg[/atsimg]
Originally posted by Komodo
To me, looking at the video, they look as if they are at a near snails pace....
Originally posted by Komodo
Would not the tether be getting smaller and smaller over short period of time in the lens of the camera since the shuttle is still moving away at albeit a accelerated pace AWAY from the tether?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Komodo
As DepthofField has pointed out several times, the shape of the bokeh discs are dependent upon their position in the frame. The appearance of the out of focus objects changes due to the characteristics of the the camera used.