It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zorgon
So explain to me how it is logical that we can see this thin wire yet all those other pieces of debris are not visible?
Originally posted by poet1b
You keep implying that people who see things differently than the official reason are less entitled to their opinions than the people who agree with the official version.
If you THINK the official explanation is right, then you are buying into the official explanation.
There have been many times when the official explanation has disagreed with the witnesses and the facts. Thus it is very valid to question the official explanation/version of things.
Do you believe everything that the government tells you?
If not, why do you imply that those of us to question what our government tells us are simply seeing things the way we want to see them, as opposed to giving our honest opinion.
Originally posted by zorgon
It is also obvious that this incidence strikes a nerve with NASA et al considering how much time Jim has put into this.
Originally posted by zorgon
In the original video when Mission control asks "what are we seeing" they state that the tether is WIDER THAN EXPECTED..
Originally posted by zorgon
And here is another point...
There is a LOT of space junk out there, much of it is much larger than the diameter of the tether (0.1 inch) Much of it is more reflective than the thin wire of the tether...
So why do we not see all these pieces of junque with the naked eye? If it was ONLY sun reflection the skies would be FULL of moving bright pieces of debris, flashing as they rotate, but all we see is a few bigger pieces
.....................
So explain to me how it is logical that we can see this thin wire yet all those other pieces of debris are not visible?
What do you think is more probable to be true, that those things that look like out of focus bright objects are small out of focus bright objects or that they are an unknown life form or space ships from an unknown origin?
Originally posted by depthoffield
Your response was a hint of some ignorance to my post: "Nice story"
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by Phage
Your example is not applicable.
There is only one artifact on display and it's orientation is constant...
*Note the presence of multiple objects, their different directions of travel and varying orientations...
Originally posted by poet1b
I don't know how else to interpret your comments on the matter. You don't seem to recognize that others come to a different conclusion because they interpret what they are seeing differently than you. You statements make it clear that you don't think those who disagree with the official version stated in the video are looking at the facts of the situation.
It seems that you are either incapable or unwilling to look at the information available in any different light than what you want to believe. You may not have bought the de-bunker/offical position, but you are in the process of buying it.
There are not any other videos that anyone has found that shows numerous of these white dot looking UFOs in NASA film footage. IF these ice crystals are so common, than there should be plenty of videos of this type.
The tiny white dots moving around the tether look for the most part like opaque white little dots, and only a few become large translucent images with a hole in the center when the camera setting are changed making everything much more white.
Considering this, how could an ice crystal close to the camera that is already translucent look like an opaque white dot when the camera is focused on the distant tether.
My own personal experimentation with a camera shows that this is not possible, that tiny things like the head of a pin essentially disappear when focusing on much further distant objects.
The other video which attempts to focus on a cloud, where the focus changes constantly also clearly shows that a small object just in front of the camera retains its approximate shape as it blurs from changes in focus. Ice crystals do not from into round little dots, they are crystals.
When the camera moves while concentrating on a distant object, anything near the lens moves a great distance on the screen, while the distant object barely moves, which is not what we see in the tether video, we see these UFOs moving in relation to the tether as if the tether and the UFO's were about the same distance from the camera.
The op who started this thread clearly shows these UFO's moving independently by changing direction in several different directions, and by changing speeds.
Why anyone continues to insist these are ice crystals considering the evaluate evidence is beyond me.
To stick to the ice crystal theory when under examination it is shown not to be possible is just blind faith in my opinion.
Originally posted by poet1b
When the camera moves while concentrating on a distant object, anything near the lens moves a great distance on the screen,
Originally posted by Akezzon
But I also believe that the out of focus also magnify everything a bit, so the shape on the "critters" might not be so misleading as we may think.
Perhaps they look like that, but that the out of focus make them a bit larger.
Originally posted by Akezzon
That's kinda my point Zorgon. You sure you didn't missunderstand me now??