It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by JimOberg
You are saying this is a fair solution?
Hmmm I see your point... fair enough then, I will make an effort to track down the time this was shot..But seriously I would think that NASA with those expensive tax payer paid for computers, and having all those years since 1996, could tell us what time the tether broke.
Does that not sound reasonable?
Originally posted by zorgon
You still expect me to believe that a 0.1 inch wire can reflect that much sunlight that it is visible to the naked eye on earth?
Originally posted by JimOberg
It's true, and I saw it, and Paul Maley saw it, and the crew on 'Columbia' saw it go dark when it went into shadow (and reported it by radio in real time),
but I can see that you just are not capable of believing things that run counter to your existing guesses.
Originally posted by zorgon
As I can see you are not capable of addressing the glowing plasma explanation in the NASA reports
Originally posted by JimObergThe time the tether broke has nothing to do with the time the swarm was recorded, days later.
I'm figuring Martyn logged his recordings -- don't all broadcast professionals do that? The log would have the time he recorded it.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Raybo58
OK, I understand it now, but if you are talking about what happens when the camera moves (pans) perpendicularly to the direction to which it is pointing, you should know that this does not happen (as far as I know) on that STS-75 video, the camera could only zoom in and out and rotate.
Originally posted by depthoffield
Yes, little but out of focus objects near the camera can be visible in the image as "disks" with sharp edges....which seems to be transparent, so from there the illusion of "behind the distant tether". It is called "transparent BOKEH"
here is the result of digging, it was easy
[edit on 11/6/09 by depthoffield]
Originally posted by zorgon
Or would that cause you trouble within your circle?
Originally posted by Raybo58
Could you please give this a rest? Unless you have proof, constantly making accusations like "You know you want to jump the fence" and such are unproductive and just become tiresome after awhile.
The man has already stated that he's not a denier, that he has seen what he believes to be UFO's and he has gone out of his way to publicly shame NASA in the past. Complaining about his "Ins" begin to sound more like jealousy after awhile. Like any good scientist, he knows he's obligated to attempt to *disprove* a theory before accepting any implied conclusions. You can't arrive at truth based on syllogisms.
Smug insinuations do nothing to help your arguments and contribute to an impression that you're not very mature.
A well built evidentiary case will speak for itself. Baseless character assassination more often comes from people who know their arguments are weak.
Plenty of videos have been posted here showing a THRUSTER flash then sudden change in direction of the objects.
The classic one is of whats supposed to be a weapon fired from the ground at a UFO and it changes direction the thruster flash is seen a second before that occurs
Originally posted by i_want_the_truth
I am so looking forward to the day when an outside source( NOT GOV ) will be able to provide us with some real information.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by wmd_2008
Greetings,
Please provide us with the thruster logs that corroborate your hypothesis.
*It is the least you could do.
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by wmd_2008
Plenty of videos have been posted here showing a THRUSTER flash then sudden change in direction of the objects.
The classic one is of whats supposed to be a weapon fired from the ground at a UFO and it changes direction the thruster flash is seen a second before that occurs
what does that have to do with the STS-75 video ? no thruster firing is visible in the tether video and to say that thruster firings are continuously occurring is absurd. if you could prove the objects are close to the shuttle(DOF video examples do not prove that is the case in this video) and had the thruster firing records then the "invisible thruster plume" might be a possibility, but even then it would be a stretch to conclusivly say that explains everything going on in the video.
thanks for your input and i respect your opinions but...your gonna need more than that to convince me , thanks
Thruster firings don't have to be visible, especially in the far-off-centerline regions of thin plume flow.
Thruster firings can occur in groups lasting several seconds, but you're correct that much longer periods are unusual -- not non-existent, but unusual -- for thrusters. However, other effluent releases can last for many minutes -- eg, water dumps, APU exhaust, flash evaporator operation, airlock depressurization.
The thruster records for the 'swarm' period have not been examined, I believe, because the posters of the video have withheld the date/time the scene was recorded.
It is not required to 'conclusively' identify the scene as showing nearby objects responding to exhaust flow. To make the scene evidence for something unusual, somebody must conclusively show that there's no way there were any nearby particles and shuttle-derived gas releases.
I'm waiting.
What was that phrase the Red Queen told Alice? "First the verdict, THEN the trial"? Was she your soul mate?
Originally posted by easynow
where exactly was the camera located that captured this ? verses where would APU exhaust ect. , be in relation to the FOV ?