Freemasons - Another child fingerprinting scam/fair, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 12:37 AM by KSigMason
Originally posted by suzque66
The questions I asked have no been answered without bias from internet Masons.

Facts are not biased.

Originally posted by suzque66
The conversation is what it is. It turned into me defending my distaste for Masonry. The topic began with my comment that the whole idea of this sensitive information in the hands of Masons.

And we've posted time and time again that no information is kept. I am sure that we could bring you to an event and show you that we don't keep information and you still would not be satisfied.

Originally posted by Wertdagf
Being able to identify and locate people is a natural desire that will be fullfilled. I bet your parents would love too see where you are right now.. not because they want to kill you with a gps guided self-propelled sniper bullet, but because they love and care about you and would like to be more a part of your life than they are now.

The program is not a tracking program. It's to assist in the recovery of a missing child.

Originally posted by suzque66
Speaking of ego, I don't need 2, 3 or 5 other chapter brothers or sisters to come pat my back (online or off) nor come to my defense of any crap affiliation. I guess my ego is bigger than yours. I am quite capable of standing alone here while you have 'possey'. Yeah..I'd say my ego is more entact than perhaps yours. Thanks

See we're just trying to stop the defamation of a good program. You are just baselessly lying about the Freemasons. The reason we stand together is because we know what we are talking about.

You seem to be satisfied with lying about a group you have no knowledge of. When confronted with your reasons you gave none. You basically have distaste Freemasons for no reason.

You seem to connecting dots that don't exist.


reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 12:41 AM by suzque66
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus



"A forum where two people can debate a topic without outside interference. This way we do not have to hear you complain about more then one person responding to your screeds. "

Don't exaggerate. I mentioned ONCE that your mason brothers had to come aid you in the discussion.

Wasn't a complaint anyways, was an observation. Do you see me crying or becoming a damsel in distress by your 'possey'? Couldn't care less if 3 grown men feel all gangland tough by tossing ridiculous personal accusations at a mother of children that I would have never allow near one of your buildings..let alone the persons in attendance. I am a big, small girl. I don't need 'rescuing' by any brotherhood.

I also have no interest in any formal debate to be judged, why would I verbally spar with someone who has lead in their gloves?

PS! I didn't lie, although your brother did get caught in one thus far.

[edit on 25-5-2009 by suzque66]

[edit on 25-5-2009 by suzque66]



reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 12:53 AM by suzque66
reply to post by AugustusMasonicus



The FIRST time I mentioned your possey as me not needing '2, 3 or 4' persons to aid me in this discussion you failed to defend that.

What facts are there to argue with you? You like these boys, I don't. You trust them, I don't.

What next? inviting me to a lodge for a tea party to be all chummy? No thanks lol.

I told you, I want nothing to do with your seemingly one and only true love --the Masons.


reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 01:03 AM by suzque66
Originally posted by Roark
Originally posted by suzque66
and Roark? How can you compare car seats to pedophiles and kidnapping? It is obvious I have a distaste for Masons and all they stand for.

[edit on 24-5-2009 by suzque66]


Yeah, it IS obvious, and it kinda detracts from your arguments, to be honest.

My comparison, which you apparently failed to grasp, was more around the provision of a free safety-oriented service. More importantly, I was questioning why someone would want to badmouth such a service.

I didn’t mention pedophiles at all, and I don’t understand why you even brought them up. They have nothing to do with this discussion.


You said: "It's like if some organisation was offering to fund the professional inspection of baby seats in cars, and you were all like "well, baby seats don't really prevent deaths in car accidents". "

You cannot even compare a safety check like this to taking sensitive information such as DNA, figerprints, dental records and pictures. The whole premise behind most kidnappers is pedophellia related. I doubt the majority of cases are not because a couple (or person) is in dire need for a child. Not every case turns out to be a happy childhood elsewhere for these kids.

My idea of 'free safety-oriented service' would be more along the lines of teaching our children to be kinder individuals to begin with so they don't grow up to be creeps walking the streets grasping children.

Sign me up for that program of VALUE to citizenry.

[edit on 25-5-2009 by suzque66]



reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 01:18 AM by KSigMason
Originally posted by suzque66
You cannot even compare a safety check like this to taking sensitive information such as DNA, figerprints, dental records and pictures.

The program doesn't keep it so who cares if they take a swab. The parent keeps it.

Originally posted by suzque66
My idea of 'free safety-oriented service' would be more along the lines of teaching our children to be kinder individuals to begin with so they don't grow up to be creeps walking the streets grasping children.

Well, it's one thing for us to offer a voluntary service, it would be another thing to tell parents how to raise their kids. It's still a free country.

Originally posted by suzque66
Putting words in that form is simply 'lying'.

I summarized what happened over 4-pages.

Originally posted by suzque66
It is not defamation. I don't like them and I have the right to my opinions. Defamation is what you just wrote about me actually by making up an imaginary scenerio.

Defamation: A false statement that injures someone's reputation and exposes him to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, or condemnation. If the false statement is published in print or through broadcast media, such as radio or TV, it is called libel. If it is only spoken, it is called slander.

You've clearly provided no evidence other than your opinion, that is defamation. I can prove that you've said what I summarized.

Originally posted by suzque66
I don't care if you call me the T-word. You do not intimidate me. You are only as tough as the people you associate with. Without them, you would perhaps have no self-esteem at all. Good for you, going out to get some of that all on your own

I wasn't trying to intimidate you. I have plenty of self-esteem...what's that have to do with anything? Maybe you should stop patronizing and prove your posts. Their evil because I think so is not fact.


reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 01:25 AM by RuneSpider
reply to post by jaamaan



The process is done in front of the parent.

The parent receives all of the information.

Nothing is kept by the guys doing it, in any of the organizations.
And the structure is fairly open.

[edit on 25-5-2009 by RuneSpider]


reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 01:38 AM by W3RLIED2
Originally posted by jaamaan
I would never give my childrens DNA to an organisations that is not transparent and is based on secrets.


No one takes the DNA, or any other information. It's all given to the parents... You would know that if you've read the multiple replies and links provided.

How can i ever realy find out what will happen to the information if the organisation that is gathering it is a secret organisation ?


You can find Masonic lodges in a phone book. And the child id is not secret. Again, only the parents get their childs information.

Maybe it is all out of good will, but there is not realy a way for me to check this.

It's a free service for the community. If you don't like the way it sounds then don't participate. No one is forcing any of this upon parents and children.

There can be many personal accounts of people who are freemasons and helped with this program, but that does not tell me any thing of what might happen outside my knowledge because the whole structure of the organisation that is gathering this information is a secret one.


Take it or leave it. This is an internet forum message board. None of the information is stored. I'm no liar and for all I know you could be stay puft the marshmallow man.

Maybe this CHIP program states that all information that they collect will not be kept and stored, but how in the world can i check that if the organisation who is collecting it is a secret one?


You can come to a booth if you ever see one. Talk with the guys puting it on ask all the questions you wish. Some one will be more than happy to explain it to you.


reply posted on 25-5-2009 @ 01:40 AM by RuneSpider
reply to post by suzque66



See, here's the thing I don't understand about people like you.
There are plenty of people I don't agree with, here.

However, I don't go out of my way to be insulting, something that relegates you from being someone who you can debate with, to just being a troll.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Leaked video of freemason-show.
  Posted 4 days ago with 37 member flags
The Templar Uprising
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
Jay-Z is Nicki Minaj?
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
CNBC yet another Luciferian ILLUMINATI Network ! ! !
  Posted 18 days ago with 6 member flags
The Three Ruffians
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags
32nd level mason
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The Hive Mind
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
A Transparent and Open Secretive Society devoted to Truth
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 69 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 56 replies