It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by evil incarnate
One more time for the benefit of those that refuse to read the thread in its entirety
No right was violated in the context in which it had happened , covering it to show respect , as the way in which it would have shown up on camera , if it wasn't covered , would have only shown a part of the symbol in an undesired manor .
If the then that would most certainly be a violation of the constitution .
Originally posted by evil incarnate
I could care less what it might have been, could have been, had the potential of being. Was there a violation of anyone's rights?
Originally posted by Max_TO
Originally posted by evil incarnate
I could care less what it might have been, could have been, had the potential of being. Was there a violation of anyone's rights?
Sense the premiss of your argument was based on the -
Originally posted by evil incarnate
What exactly does the constitution say about covering up statues or hiding religious figures from photo ops?
Originally posted by evil incarnate
it was a photo op. It was staged in a particular manner. That means they controlled the forground as well as the background. Why don't you just tell us what the reported reason is then? Maybe you and I know better than to automatically believe that he is endorsing the symbol in the picture makes no difference. You and I were not the intended audience. The majority of America was.
Originally posted by evil incarnate
You do realize that as a guest speaker anywhere, it is THEIR obligation to set a comfortable stage for you.
Originally posted by evil incarnate
Why on earth would anyone want our president representing only Christians or appearing that way?
Originally posted by evil incarnate
I quite clearly stated that YOU ARE TRYING TO JUST HATE OBAMA. Not this thread, but yes you!
Originally posted by Max_TO
That was the foundation of your argument and yes it was wrong as that was NOT the reason that it was covered .
Originally posted by Max_TO
No elected official should ever have the right to tell a place or person what they can or can not do if it is a right granted by the constitution . If they government has an issue with how a person or place is expressing there constitutional right well then the government has the right to simply not go to the place .
Originally posted by Max_TO
The president is no religious leader , he is however bound by oath to up hold the constitution , you know the whole preserve protect and defend thing , wether he likes it or not . As such he needs to know his roll .
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by amazed
If any form of government ever comes to your house and makes a request of you to cover your religious symbols of choice I would be happy to come stand by your side and defend your right to display whatever you like as guaranteed by the Constitution .
In general I see the erosion of the Constitution as a bigger and bigger issue with each passing day .
However , the government went there and simply should not put its self over the places it goes to as long as the respected place was operating within its constitutional rights .
IMHO we see far to often the erosion of individual rights and we in general have become to complacent when ones rights are infringed upon .
Originally posted by Max_TO
I was responding to the context in which you were presenting your argument .
Second line
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by evil incarnate
Do you disagree that you were making a case for covering the symbol based on a means of disassociation ?
Based on how you presented your argument thats sure how it seemed .
Yes IMHO no rights were subverted in this instance , however , if someone want to make the argument that was ok to cover , based on a means of dissociation then I would humbly disagree with that position and I would go as far as to make a case agents that position .
Thats the whole ball of wax right there my friend I can not say it any other way .